Re: Bug severity question

2002-04-01 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 01 Apr 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > On 01-Apr-2002 Will Newton wrote: > > Is it acceptable to downgrade a serious bug to important if it is a build > > error on an arch that has never built correctly in the past? > > > > The problem is being worked on, it's just taking a little time

Re: Bug severity question

2002-04-01 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 01 Apr 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > On 01-Apr-2002 Will Newton wrote: > > Is it acceptable to downgrade a serious bug to important if it is a build > > error on an arch that has never built correctly in the past? > > > > The problem is being worked on, it's just taking a little tim

Re: Bug severity question

2002-04-01 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 01-Apr-2002 Will Newton wrote: > > Is it acceptable to downgrade a serious bug to important if it is a build > error on an arch that has never built correctly in the past? > > The problem is being worked on, it's just taking a little time, and I see no > reason to make users of another arch

Bug severity question

2002-04-01 Thread Will Newton
Is it acceptable to downgrade a serious bug to important if it is a build error on an arch that has never built correctly in the past? The problem is being worked on, it's just taking a little time, and I see no reason to make users of another architecture suffer because of this. -- To UNSUB

Re: Bug severity question

2002-04-01 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 01-Apr-2002 Will Newton wrote: > > Is it acceptable to downgrade a serious bug to important if it is a build > error on an arch that has never built correctly in the past? > > The problem is being worked on, it's just taking a little time, and I see no > reason to make users of another arc

Bug severity question

2002-04-01 Thread Will Newton
Is it acceptable to downgrade a serious bug to important if it is a build error on an arch that has never built correctly in the past? The problem is being worked on, it's just taking a little time, and I see no reason to make users of another architecture suffer because of this. -- To UNSU