On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:55:19PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors, you wrote:
- I did not verify that the new .orig.tar.gz is indeed genuine
md5sums are identical with upstream's tarball, I just double checked.
- the following duplicates the call to
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:55:19PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors, you wrote:
- I did not verify that the new .orig.tar.gz is indeed genuine
md5sums are identical with upstream's tarball, I just double checked.
- the following duplicates the call to
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:05:45AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
In linux.debian.devel, you wrote:
It came to my attention that the 'bugzilla' Debian package is currently
not in Sarge, due to several RC bugs.
If you consider this package worthy of inclusion in Sarge (note that is
is
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors, you wrote:
- I did not verify that the new .orig.tar.gz is indeed genuine
md5sums are identical with upstream's tarball, I just double checked.
- the following duplicates the call to fix_www_data_perm for
/var/cache/bugzilla, and in addition, this change
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:05:45AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
In linux.debian.devel, you wrote:
It came to my attention that the 'bugzilla' Debian package is currently
not in Sarge, due to several RC bugs.
If you consider this package worthy of inclusion in Sarge (note that is
is
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors, you wrote:
- I did not verify that the new .orig.tar.gz is indeed genuine
md5sums are identical with upstream's tarball, I just double checked.
- the following duplicates the call to fix_www_data_perm for
/var/cache/bugzilla, and in addition, this change
6 matches
Mail list logo