Paul Gevers wrote:
> Some time ago I tried unoconv for my package, but it had issues as can
> be seen in the bts:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491456#102
>
> Do you know a way to get it done? (I have to look into jodconverter).
Yes, I saw this bug as well, but "worked around"
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> I have a source package that has pdf documentation, which is generated
>> with openoffice.org. Is it possible to generate said pdf without user
>> interacion (that is, for autobuilding in the buildds)? Or maybe I can
>> just ship the also-includ
Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 17:31 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> I have a source package that has pdf documentation, which is generated
>> with openoffice.org. Is it possible to generate said pdf without user
>> interacion (that is, for autobuilding in the buildds)? Or maybe I ca
Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I have a source package that has pdf documentation, which is generated
> with openoffice.org. Is it possible to generate said pdf without user
> interacion (that is, for autobuilding in the buildds)? Or maybe I can
> just ship the also-included pdf files? AFAICS, the license
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 17:31 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I have a source package that has pdf documentation, which is generated
> with openoffice.org. Is it possible to generate said pdf without user
> interacion (that is, for autobuilding in the buildds)? Or maybe I can
> just ship the also-incl
I have a source package that has pdf documentation, which is generated
with openoffice.org. Is it possible to generate said pdf without user
interacion (that is, for autobuilding in the buildds)? Or maybe I can
just ship the also-included pdf files? AFAICS, the license is not
violated.
--
Saludo
6 matches
Mail list logo
