Re: Considering package removal [glademm]

2008-12-21 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Christoph Egger (21/12/2008): > Jup I know the procedure, I was more in trouble wether it is > reasonable. There is no need I guess to have this done for lenny. You can propose/ask for opinion on debian...@. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Considering package removal [glademm]

2008-12-21 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Thanks for your reply. Neil Williams schrieb: > On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:59:33 +0100 > Christoph Egger wrote: > >> As I have never requested removal of an package I'm asking here for >> some opinions to make sure my thoughts are reasonable. Any comments >> are welcome! >> >> Some Data: >>

Considering package removal [glademm]

2008-12-21 Thread Christoph Egger
As I have never requested removal of an package I'm asking here for some opinions to make sure my thoughts are reasonable. Any comments are welcome! =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Some Data: * Popcon inst: 359 * Open Bugs: 6 <=3D normal * Last upstream release: May 2005 * priority: optional * Section: de

Re: Considering package removal [glademm]

2008-12-21 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:59:33 +0100 Christoph Egger wrote: > As I have never requested removal of an package I'm asking here for > some opinions to make sure my thoughts are reasonable. Any comments > are welcome! > > Some Data: > > * Popcon inst: 359 > * Open Bugs: 6 <= normal > * Last ups

Considering package removal [glademm]

2008-12-21 Thread Christoph Egger
As I have never requested removal of an package I'm asking here for some opinions to make sure my thoughts are reasonable. Any comments are welcome! =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Some Data: * Popcon inst: 359 * Open Bugs: 6 <=3D normal * Last upstream release: May 2005 * priority: optional * Section: de