Correcting a version number

2013-12-10 Thread Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I have realised that in an earlier package upload, I made a blunder with regards the version of the package. The package was versioned as 0.5b0-1, though I somehow missed, despite testing the watch file that this should have been 0.5~b0

Re: Correcting a version number

2013-12-10 Thread Andreas Metzler
Daniel Lintott wrote: [..] > I have realised that in an earlier package upload, I made a blunder > with regards the version of the package. > The package was versioned as 0.5b0-1, though I somehow missed, despite > testing the watch file that this should have been 0.5~b0-1. > I have seen some di

Re: Correcting a version number

2013-12-10 Thread Dominik George
Hi, >I have realised that in an earlier package upload, I made a blunder >with regards the version of the package. Where is that package now? On mentors, or in Debian? -nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l

Re: Correcting a version number

2013-12-10 Thread Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/13 18:59, Dominik George wrote: > Hi, > >> I have realised that in an earlier package upload, I made a >> blunder with regards the version of the package. > > > Where is that package now? On mentors, or in Debian? > > -nik > > The packa

Re: Correcting a version number

2013-12-10 Thread Dominik George
>[2] http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=vpcs_0.5b0-1 In that special case, I'd even say your versioning "mistake" is good because upstream's ~ notation is a mess. That char is reserved for Debian ;) (yes, that's false and not so humble ;))! Why not keep your version numbering as it is and u

Re: Correcting a version number

2013-12-10 Thread Daniel Lintott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/13 19:21, Dominik George wrote: >> [2] http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=vpcs_0.5b0-1 > > In that special case, I'd even say your versioning "mistake" is > good because upstream's ~ notation is a mess. That char is reserved > for Debian

Re: Correcting a version number

2013-12-11 Thread Andreas Metzler
Daniel Lintott wrote: > On 10/12/13 19:21, Dominik George wrote: >>> [2] http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=vpcs_0.5b0-1 >> In that special case, I'd even say your versioning "mistake" is >> good because upstream's ~ notation is a mess. That char is reserved >> for Debian ;) (yes, that's fals