Le Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:36:10PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson a écrit :
>
> When can we expect
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/
>
> to be populated with anything beyond emptyness?
Hello,
with the help of the admins, the CVS repository of the dep Alioth project was
deleted, and the a
söndag den 29 maj 2011 klockan 16:53 skrev Lars Wirzenius detta:
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:57:29PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people
> > hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as
> > the copyright file
On 05/30/2011 08:34 PM, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote:
> Why not just make it a format, e.g. require that some things must
> presents here, some another must be there, but leave it relatively
> free-form?
>
Because the goal is to stop the mess, not to reduce its amount,
and also to have the copyright
Hello,
On Mon, 30 May 2011 17:39:40 +0800
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional
> > debian/copyright.
> Which format are you talking about? The "old good traditional
> format" is in fact no format at all, with no rules, and we had
> all sorts
On 05/30/2011 01:46 AM, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote:
> It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional
> debian/copyright.
>
Which format are you talking about? The "old good traditional
format" is in fact no format at all, with no rules, and we had
all sorts of formatting, which i
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:57:29PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> Hi,
> I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people
> hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as
> the copyright file is complete I don't think this fulfills the goal of
> this DEP.
>
söndag den 29 maj 2011 klockan 16:53 skrev Lars Wirzenius detta:
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:57:29PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people
> use whatever you feel best like. The spec suggests something like this:
>
> http://s
"Andrew O. Shadoura" writes:
> It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional
> debian/copyright.
I personally don't agree. I think DEP-5 is easier to read because it's
the same as every other package that uses DEP-5 (well, once we get the
format hammered out), so I can quickl
Hello,
On Mon, 30 May 2011 01:05:02 +0800
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> P.S: What's blocking DEP5 from reaching the policy?
> I think it's great the way it is right now already...
Isn't it way too machine-oriented to be in the policy?
It's much harder to read it for humans than old good traditional
On 05/29/2011 11:53 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:57:29PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
>
>> I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people
>> hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as
>> the copyright file is complete I don
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:57:29PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people
> hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as
> the copyright file is complete I don't think this fulfills the goal of
> this DEP.
This is
Hi,
I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people
hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as
the copyright file is complete I don't think this fulfills the goal of
this DEP.
It would be nice if the involved people would clarify what should be
used.
12 matches
Mail list logo
