> > I'm building a package that depends on gdbm 1.8.0, which is newer
> > than the version Debian uses. I notified the gdbm maintainer, but
> > have not received a response.
>
> Well, a response _was_ sent.
>
> | So; go ahead and include the non-shared gdbm1.8.
Terribly sorry about that... It ap
Jon Eisenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm building a package that depends on gdbm 1.8.0, which is newer
> than the version Debian uses. I notified the gdbm maintainer, but
> have not received a response.
Well, a response _was_ sent.
--
James
| From nobody Sun Jan 21 16:52:16 2001
| Send
> I'm building a package that depends on gdbm 1.8.0, which is newer than the
> version Debian uses. I notified the gdbm maintainer, but have not received
> a response.
Sorry, I looked quickly and didn't realize just how out of date this
package really was. Bug #38026 contains the 1.8.0 availabili
> I'm building a package that depends on gdbm 1.8.0, which is newer than the
> version Debian uses. I notified the gdbm maintainer, but have not received
> a response.
How long did you wait? James is a very busy guy with a lot of
responsibilities. He'll get to you eventually.
You should file a
I'm building a package that depends on gdbm 1.8.0, which is newer than the
version Debian uses. I notified the gdbm maintainer, but have not received
a response. The source package, presumably because it's an uncommonly used
version of gdbm, contains the source to 1.8.0 which can be used during the
> > I'm building a package that depends on gdbm 1.8.0, which is newer
> > than the version Debian uses. I notified the gdbm maintainer, but
> > have not received a response.
>
> Well, a response _was_ sent.
>
> | So; go ahead and include the non-shared gdbm1.8.
Terribly sorry about that... It a
Jon Eisenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm building a package that depends on gdbm 1.8.0, which is newer
> than the version Debian uses. I notified the gdbm maintainer, but
> have not received a response.
Well, a response _was_ sent.
--
James
| From nobody Sun Jan 21 16:52:16 2001
| Sen
> I'm building a package that depends on gdbm 1.8.0, which is newer than the
> version Debian uses. I notified the gdbm maintainer, but have not received
> a response.
Sorry, I looked quickly and didn't realize just how out of date this
package really was. Bug #38026 contains the 1.8.0 availabil
> I'm building a package that depends on gdbm 1.8.0, which is newer than the
> version Debian uses. I notified the gdbm maintainer, but have not received
> a response.
How long did you wait? James is a very busy guy with a lot of
responsibilities. He'll get to you eventually.
You should file a
I'm building a package that depends on gdbm 1.8.0, which is newer than the
version Debian uses. I notified the gdbm maintainer, but have not received
a response. The source package, presumably because it's an uncommonly used
version of gdbm, contains the source to 1.8.0 which can be used during th
10 matches
Mail list logo
