Re: Depends xxx <- Version: 3:20161105-1

2017-06-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 02:11:22PM +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote: > Okay, I didn't want that this lintian error affected Depends and/or > Recommends too: > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/depends-on-build-essential-package-without-using-version.html Have you read the tag description? It says you don't

Re: Depends xxx <- Version: 3:20161105-1

2017-06-09 Thread James Cowgill
Hi, On 09/06/17 13:11, Narcis Garcia wrote: > El 09/06/17 a les 14:01, James Cowgill ha escrit: >> Hi, >> >> On 09/06/17 12:54, Narcis Garcia wrote: >>> Hello, I'm trying to build a package that depends on another one >>> (iputils-ping), but the other's version in Debian is marked with a >>> notat

Re: Depends xxx <- Version: 3:20161105-1

2017-06-09 Thread Narcis Garcia
__ I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service administrator should fix this. El 09/06/17 a les 14:01, James Cowgill ha escrit: > Hi, > > On 09/06/17 12:54, Narcis Garcia wrote: >> Hello, I'm trying to

Re: Depends xxx <- Version: 3:20161105-1

2017-06-09 Thread James Cowgill
Hi, On 09/06/17 12:54, Narcis Garcia wrote: > Hello, I'm trying to build a package that depends on another one > (iputils-ping), but the other's version in Debian is marked with a > notation I don't know: > 3:20161105-1 > > - Which is this software's version? 3? This is documented in debian-poli

Depends xxx <- Version: 3:20161105-1

2017-06-09 Thread Narcis Garcia
Hello, I'm trying to build a package that depends on another one (iputils-ping), but the other's version in Debian is marked with a notation I don't know: 3:20161105-1 - Which is this software's version? 3? - What is the best formula for "control" file in my new package, having present that any ve