Hi,
still an newbie and so many questions. Please bear with me.
My package opm-common list as one of the blocking migration that autopkgtest
fails for armhf and i386. https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=opm-common
The reason is that there are no packages built for these architecture as I l
Am 22.01.2022 um 15:06 teilte Markus Blatt mit:
Hi,
I limit the architecture to only 64bit architectures by having
"Architecture: amd64 arm64 ia64 mips64el ppc64el" in d/control. Yet
this does not seem to respected for autopkgtest as it still tries to
run the test for i386 and armhf.
The d/co
On 2022-01-22 15:06 +0100, Markus Blatt wrote:
> For why 32bit architectures are not listed:
> Many tests of the buildsystem of the upstream package fail because of Y2K38
> bugs.
> Upstream does not see that as a problem as running a simulation on these
> architectures
> or simulations of just 16
Wookey writes:
> If the package builds on the 32bit arches then I would advise that you
> let it build. We always try to build for all arches in debian and it
> is very annoying if you have say an armhf machine and something is not
> available just because there was some test failure so upstream
On 1/24/22 09:10, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Wookey writes:
>> If the package builds on the 32bit arches then I would advise that you
>> let it build. We always try to build for all arches in debian and it
>> is very annoying if you have say an armhf machine and something is not
>> available just bec
Hi,
Am Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:38:32AM +0100 schrieb Helge Deller:
On 1/24/22 09:10, Ole Streicher wrote:
Wookey writes:
If the package builds on the 32bit arches then I would advise that you
let it build. We always try to build for all arches in debian and it
is very annoying if you have sa
Helge Deller writes:
> On 1/24/22 09:10, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> Wookey writes:
>>> If the package builds on the 32bit arches then I would advise that you
>>> let it build. We always try to build for all arches in debian and it
>>> is very annoying if you have say an armhf machine and something
On 1/24/22 11:36, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Helge Deller writes:
>> On 1/24/22 09:10, Ole Streicher wrote:
>>> Wookey writes:
If the package builds on the 32bit arches then I would advise that you
let it build. We always try to build for all arches in debian and it
is very annoying i
Hi Helge,
Helge Deller writes:
> That's why I'm saying that you shouldn't exclude by default a *specific*
> architecture. The problem is often not bound to that architecture, but by
> the specifics which define that architecture (endianess, 32/64-bit, ...).
this brings me to the point why we don
9 matches
Mail list logo
