I have ITP'd dict-gcide (Bug#100892). This package will provide,
conflict and replace dict-web1913. I intend to provide an empty
(dummy) dict-web1913 package that will depend on dict-gcide.
The only thing functionally required in the dummy package is a
control file, and possibly a READ
I have ITP'd dict-gcide (Bug#100892). This package will provide,
conflict and replace dict-web1913. I intend to provide an empty
(dummy) dict-web1913 package that will depend on dict-gcide.
The only thing functionally required in the dummy package is a
control file, and possibly a REA
The only thing functionally required in the dummy package is a
> control file, and possibly a README.Debian file advising the user that
> he may purge this package at any time.
Don't even bother with the README.Debian file, just have an empty
package and this message in the Descri
t; Don't even bother with the README.Debian file, just have an empty
> package and this message in the Description field in the control
> file.
>
> > In order to be allowed in the archive, will it be necessary to
> > provide a copyright file?
>
> No.
>
>
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:46:20PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> > > In order to be allowed in the archive, will it be necessary to
> > > provide a copyright file?
> >
> > No.
Er, YES.
> Thanks, Julian. This works like a charm, but Lintian has the
> following objections:
>
> E: dict-
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:07:57PM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:46:20PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> > > > In order to be allowed in the archive, will it be necessary to
> > > > provide a copyright file?
> > >
> > > No.
>
> Er, YES.
Er, NO. My package sgb-src
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:46:20PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> Thanks, Julian. This works like a charm, but Lintian has the
> following objections:
>
> E: dict-web1913: no-copyright-file
> W: dict-web1913: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> W: dict-web1913: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-
The only thing functionally required in the dummy package is a
> control file, and possibly a README.Debian file advising the user that
> he may purge this package at any time.
Don't even bother with the README.Debian file, just have an empty
package and this message in the Descri
t; Don't even bother with the README.Debian file, just have an empty
> package and this message in the Description field in the control
> file.
>
> > In order to be allowed in the archive, will it be necessary to
> > provide a copyright file?
>
> No.
>
>
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:46:20PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> > > In order to be allowed in the archive, will it be necessary to
> > > provide a copyright file?
> >
> > No.
Er, YES.
> Thanks, Julian. This works like a charm, but Lintian has the
> following objections:
>
> E: dict
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:07:57PM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:46:20PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> > > > In order to be allowed in the archive, will it be necessary to
> > > > provide a copyright file?
> > >
> > > No.
>
> Er, YES.
Er, NO. My package sgb-src
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:46:20PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> Thanks, Julian. This works like a charm, but Lintian has the
> following objections:
>
> E: dict-web1913: no-copyright-file
> W: dict-web1913: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> W: dict-web1913: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc
Dear mentor-readers,
Recently, I ran into the following problem, which I'm unable to solve
unless a powerpc (PPC) user is willing/able to assist by either performing
some tests in collaboration with me, or by (temporarily) offering me an
account.
Here's the problem:
On packages.debian.or
13 matches
Mail list logo
