On Sun, 2022-09-11 at 21:40 +0200, Philippe SWARTVAGHER wrote:
> Upstream has several files describing copyrights of the project [1-4].
> In d/copyright, I licensed the whole project with Apache 2.0, with
> "Google Inc." as copyright holder. Should I detail more?
Generally, the ftp-masters requir
Hello,
I created the shaderc package (see
https://salsa.debian.org/phsw/shaderc) and its almost ready for upload
(and RFS!). Yet, I have few questions:
* Copyright
Upstream has several files describing copyrights of the project [1-4].
In d/copyright, I licensed the whole project with Apache
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 11:31:22PM +0200, Philippe SWARTVAGHER wrote:
> - dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: can't extract name and version from library
> name 'libdia.so'
I think you can ignore these.
> - W: dia source: debian-rules-sets-DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS (line 10)
>
> Parallel builds may cause a build er
Hello,
I'm trying to adopt and update the dia package, as my first contribution
to Debian packaging.
I managed to update the package to the current upstream version (not the
easiest thing: the project moved from autotools to meson since the last
package update) and fix some lintian issues.
I th
Hi,
>> you already are a DM, you need the guest account, but it isn't requested
>> for collab-maint access
>
>You mean guest account of porterbox, right?
>I already applied, and got approved. It's for debug FTBFS of libcork
>on s390x/ppc64/sparc64.
>
>For access collab-maint, guest account of ali
Dear G,
Thanks for your quick response!
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>Now I already have acess to collab-maint (though I didn't do any work
>
>>yet), and I have become DM [0].
>
> you already are a DM, you need the guest account, but it isn't requested
>
Hi,
>Now I already have acess to collab-maint (though I didn't do any work
>yet), and I have become DM [0].
you already are a DM, you need the guest account, but it isn't requested
for collab-maint access
>Could you kindly help to set up a git repo for shadowsocks-libev on
collab-maint?
./
Dear G,
Greetings after 1+ months for this thread!
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>
>
> Hi, alternative proposal
>
>>Now I understand my todo-list, briefly:
>>- package libraries first: libcork/ipset
>>- create debian/watch and ds repack
>>- RFS shadowsocks-libev
the other two.
> - show your git skills in the meanwhile, and ask for collab-maint access
>
> (BTW it isn't requested to have the repo in collab-maint by the current
> policy)
Dear G,
I followed most of your advice, and just uploaded to mentors.
I didn't package ipset becaus
Hi, alternative proposal
>Now I understand my todo-list, briefly:
>- package libraries first: libcork/ipset
>- create debian/watch and ds repack
>- RFS shadowsocks-libev
>- apply for collab-maint access
- open ITP bugs for all the libraries (search for wnpp and ITP on google)
- package libcor
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:04 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>>If so, here's our alioth account: rosh-guest, hosiet-guest,
>>madeye-guest.>Thank you!
>
>
> you need to send a request to join collab-maint, an alioth account doesn't
> grant
> your permissions automatically.
> I sugge
Hi,
>If so, here's our alioth account: rosh-guest, hosiet-guest,
>madeye-guest.>Thank you!
you need to send a request to join collab-maint, an alioth account doesn't grant
your permissions automatically.
I suggest you to use an external repository to show your skills, and then ask
to join
(c
[Add Max and Boyuan from upstream to CC]
Thanks Gianfranco and Jakub!
I comment when I still have question, for other parts I'll follow your
suggestion.
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Roger Shimizu , 2016-05-18, 02:14:
>>
>> Some questions/issues that I'm not sure:
>> -
* Roger Shimizu , 2016-05-18, 02:14:
I'm doing ITP packaging on shadowsocks-libev. I have a few questions in
detail.
I have set up a git repo on github: https://github.com/rogers0/shadowsocks-libev
My current changes are pushed to branch: RFC
Package builds fine with command: gbp buildpa
Hi,
>I have set up a git repo on github:
>https://github.com/rogers0/shadowsocks-libev
>My current changes are pushed to branch: RFC
(I won't clone that right now, only answering questions)
>Package builds fine with command: gbp buildpackage -us -uc --git-ignore-branch
you should also try pbu
Dear mentors list,
I'm doing ITP packaging on shadowsocks-libev. I have a few questions in detail.
I have set up a git repo on github: https://github.com/rogers0/shadowsocks-libev
My current changes are pushed to branch: RFC
Package builds fine with command: gbp buildpackage -us -uc
Hi,
Now package builds fine on kfreebsd-* and hurd-i386:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=kde-gtk-config&suite=experimental
And it should be no problems with linux-based environments on other supported
architectures. So I have updated the package:
kde-gtk-config (3:2.0-3) unstab
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Karl Goetz wrote:
> I was thinking of a case where the package is built in a sid pbuilder
> (I should probably have clarified that).
Ah, ok.
> Sadly testing it only has one option - run sid :/
Strictly speaking you should test on whatever distribution you're
up
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:25:30 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Karl Goetz wrote:
>
> > I assume when you say 'unstable environment' you don't exclude the
> > possibility of using a backported lintian on (say) stable.
>
> I'd specifically exclude that. You need to build
Hi,
Christoph Egger wrote:
> At Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:57:14 +0100,
[...]
>
> Regards
>
> Christoph
>
Thanks for all the answers. And everybody else (include Christoph)
thanks for pointing out that I should use unstable/sid for developing.
This isn't a problem because I'm using a vi
Ben Finney writes:
> For such a package, you must build and test using the latest packages
> from Debian ‘unstable’ suite (== ‘sid’), and nothing else suffices.
This of course is relative to whichever suite of Debian one is uploading
the package to. If one is uploading the package to a different
Karl Goetz writes:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:22:19 +0100
> Iustin Pop wrote:
>
> > When building/uploading packages for unstable, you *must* use an
> > unstable environment (including lintian). If you're running testing
> > on your machine, then the build/verification should be done in an
> > uns
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Karl Goetz wrote:
> I assume when you say 'unstable environment' you don't exclude the
> possibility of using a backported lintian on (say) stable.
I'd specifically exclude that. You need to build under sid to ensure
the package will build and work properly in De
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:22:19 +0100
Iustin Pop wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 04:57:14PM +0100, Reinier Haasjes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2 days ago Martin uploaded Aiccu version 20070115-11 for me, that's
> > all oke. But now on the PTS-page [1] there are a few messages:
> >
> > > todo
> > >
Joachim Wiedorn writes:
> Hello,
>
> Reinier Haasjes wrote:
> > When I uploaded the package was lintian clean (mentors.d.o also told
> > me), is this because lintian.d.o runs on sid and a newer version
> > (2.3.1) of lintian (I'm running testing/2.2.18)
> Download the sid version (-all) of linti
Hello,
Reinier Haasjes wrote:
> > * Lintian reports 4 warnings about this package. You should make
> > the package lintian clean getting rid of them.
> When I uploaded the package was lintian clean (mentors.d.o also told
> me), is this because lintian.d.o runs on sid and a newer versio
At Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:57:14 +0100,
Reinier Haasjes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 2 days ago Martin uploaded Aiccu version 20070115-11 for me, that's all
> oke. But now on the PTS-page [1] there are a few messages:
>
> > * mentors.debian.net has version 20070115-11 of this package, you
> > should conside
At Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:22:19 +0100,
Iustin Pop wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 04:57:14PM +0100, Reinier Haasjes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2 days ago Martin uploaded Aiccu version 20070115-11 for me, that's all
> > oke. But now on the PTS-page [1] there are a few messages:
> >
> > > todo
> > >
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 04:57:14PM +0100, Reinier Haasjes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2 days ago Martin uploaded Aiccu version 20070115-11 for me, that's all
> oke. But now on the PTS-page [1] there are a few messages:
>
> > todo
> > * Lintian reports 4 warnings about this package. You should make the
Hi,
2 days ago Martin uploaded Aiccu version 20070115-11 for me, that's all
oke. But now on the PTS-page [1] there are a few messages:
> todo
> * Lintian reports 4 warnings about this package. You should make the
> package lintian clean getting rid of them.
When I uploaded the package was li
Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Q1)
> What's the difference between Build-Depends-Indep and Build-Depends?
Please read the Debian Policy. These fields are described there,
especially in §7.7, "Relationships between source and binary packages
- `Build-Depends', `Build-Depends-Indep', `Build-Co
Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[…]
Brian, the questions you asked are best asked on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll follow up with some answers
there.
--
\ “People's Front To Reunite Gondwanaland: Stop the Laurasian |
`\ Separatist Movement!” —wiredog, http://kuro5hin.org/ |
_
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 16:08 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have few questions that would help me to solve things in my package. I
> have package1 and package2 being same but with different dependencies,
> so the user can choose between them.
>
> First, if my
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>> So can I write:
>>
>> Package: package1
>> Conflicts: package2
>> Replaces: package2
>> [...]
>> Package: package2
>> Conflicts: package1
>> Replaces: package1
>> Provides: package1
>
> That should work quite well. If any third-party packages want to depend
> on either
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I don't want that it's possible to have them both at the same time. Once
> again, my package1 and package2 are the same, only dependencies are not.
> So can I write:
>
> Package: package1
> Conflicts: package2
> Replaces: package2
> [...]
> Package: package2
>
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:00:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Package: package1
>> Replaces: package2
>> [...]
>>
>> Package: package2
>> Replaces: package1
>>
>> The only thing that differs from both packages are dependencies, nothing
>> else.
> You said there is also a
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:00:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:08:39 +0800
> > Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I have few questions that would help me to solve things in my
> >> pac
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Neil Williams wrote:
>> I haven't tried that way of doing it - try viewing the packages in
>> deb-gview and make sure that the each postinst is a real file
>> within the Debian data of the .deb.
>
> I know it works as I had a look with "mc" and it seems that the file is
> c
Neil Williams wrote:
> So these are two packages built from the same source? There is
> one .diff.gz and one .dsc for both?
>
> That is quite different to how it sounded originally - where you had
> two source packages, not two binaries from the same source.
Sorry, I'm stupid, I should have say i
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:00:13 +0800
Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:08:39 +0800
> > Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I have few questions that would help me to solve thin
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:08:39 +0800
> Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have few questions that would help me to solve things in my
>> package. I have package1 and package2 being same but with different
>> dependencies, so
-=| Thomas Goirand, 29.01.2007 10:08 |=-
> Hi!
>
> I have few questions that would help me to solve things in my package. I
> have package1 and package2 being same but with different dependencies,
> so the user can choose between them.
>
> First, if my package produces man
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:08:39 +0800
Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have few questions that would help me to solve things in my
> package. I have package1 and package2 being same but with different
> dependencies, so the user can choose between them.
>
> First, i
Hi!
I have few questions that would help me to solve things in my package. I
have package1 and package2 being same but with different dependencies,
so the user can choose between them.
First, if my package produces many binaryies, is it ok to do symlinks of
the postinst if they are same. Like
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:27:59PM +0100, Sander Smeenk (CistroN Medewerker)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you all could've read I just adopted the micq package and i'm
> very happy with that since I use micq very often...
>
> I have a few questions because I am still a li
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:27:59PM +0100, Sander Smeenk (CistroN Medewerker) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you all could've read I just adopted the micq package and i'm
> very happy with that since I use micq very often...
>
> I have a few questions because I am still a li
This is kind of an "Am I doing this right?" message... Sorry if it's a bit
long-winded.
I've split the upstream distribution of t1lib into three packages:
t1lib0 contains the runtime libraries and the README files from the upstream
source. I wrote a "t1libconfig" script that sets up a font data
Gregory Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This probably should be on -user.
> Hello. I am setting up a web site with a whole lot of goodies
> installed also :-) I have a couple of questions and a problem, and
> if someone could at least point me in the direction I need to be
> headed in, I w
Hello.
I am setting up a web site with a whole lot of goodies installed also :-) I
have a
couple of questions and a problem, and if someone could at least point me in the
direction I need to be headed in, I would be greatly appreciative.
Here are my "silly" questions, please don't laugh too har
49 matches
Mail list logo
