On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:14:45 +0100, Muri Nicanor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/18/2018 10:02 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > Hello,
> >> they are not 600. should i set the file permissions on package upgrade
> >> or should i leave this to the user?
> >
Hi,
On 01/18/2018 10:02 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello,
>> they are not 600. should i set the file permissions on package upgrade
>> or should i leave this to the user?
>
>> if i should set them, should i use postinst or is there a better way?
>
> is
Hello,
>they are not 600. should i set the file permissions on package upgrade
>or should i leave this to the user?
>if i should set them, should i use postinst or is there a better way?
is a dh_fixperms override helpful?
G.
hi mentors,
i'm finalizing the package for the new usbguard version. the daemon now
looks at the permissions of the config files and refuses to start if
they are not 600. should i set the file permissions on package upgrade
or should i leave this to the user?
if i should set them, should
On 2006-09-11, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think exec bit in a tarball is right. Best way is to repack upstream
> sources.
No. Upstream should only be repacked in rare cases like when it contains
non-free materials.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 02:46:54PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote..
> Op ma, 11-09-2006 te 22:25 +1000, schreef James Healy:
> > Mentors,
> >
> > I am attempting to build a package and lintian is spitting out a
> > bunch of "executable-not-elf-or-script" warnings.
> >
> > The upstream tarball
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) -- 11.09.2006 15:49 --:
> I don't think exec bit in a tarball is right. Best way is to repack upstream
> sources.
Repackaging only to fix permissions is an overkill. Better fix then in
debian/rules and kindly ask upstream to provide sane permissions on
next release.
dam
--
Le lundi 11 septembre 2006 14:46, Arjan Oosting a écrit :
> Op ma, 11-09-2006 te 22:25 +1000, schreef James Healy:
> > Mentors,
> >
> > I am attempting to build a package and lintian is spitting out a bunch
> > of "executable-not-elf-or-script" warnings.
> >
> > The upstream tarball has an examples
On 2006-09-11, James Healy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The upstream tarball has an examples directory which I am installing
> into the package using dh_installexamples. None of the examples are
> shell scripts or ELF binaries, yet they seem to untar with executable
> permissions.
>
> What is the b
Op ma, 11-09-2006 te 22:25 +1000, schreef James Healy:
> Mentors,
>
> I am attempting to build a package and lintian is spitting out a bunch
> of "executable-not-elf-or-script" warnings.
>
> The upstream tarball has an examples directory which I am installing
> into the package using dh_installex
Op ma, 11-09-2006 te 22:25 +1000, schreef James Healy:
> Mentors,
>
> I am attempting to build a package and lintian is spitting out a bunch
> of "executable-not-elf-or-script" warnings.
>
> The upstream tarball has an examples directory which I am installing
> into the package using dh_installex
Le lundi 11 septembre 2006 14:25, James Healy a écrit :
> Mentors,
Hello my mentor :p
>
> I am attempting to build a package and lintian is spitting out a bunch
> of "executable-not-elf-or-script" warnings.
>
> The upstream tarball has an examples directory which I am installing
> into the packag
Mentors,
I am attempting to build a package and lintian is spitting out a bunch
of "executable-not-elf-or-script" warnings.
The upstream tarball has an examples directory which I am installing
into the package using dh_installexamples. None of the examples are
shell scripts or ELF binaries, yet
13 matches
Mail list logo
