On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:41:49PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-=| Mike Hommey, Thu, 24 May 2007 19:39:20 +0200 |=-
A standard example of this are bugs in applications that are due to
bugs in libraries they depend on. Users would report bugs on the
application, but it
-=| Mike Hommey, Fri, 25 May 2007 08:12:15 +0200 |=-
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:41:49PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-=| Mike Hommey, Thu, 24 May 2007 19:39:20 +0200 |=-
A standard example of this are bugs in applications that are due
to bugs in libraries they depend on.
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:18:19AM +0300, Damyan Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-=| Mike Hommey, Fri, 25 May 2007 08:12:15 +0200 |=-
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:41:49PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-=| Mike Hommey, Thu, 24 May 2007 19:39:20 +0200 |=-
A standard
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:04:16AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
Doesn't that fuck up versioning tracking of the BTS ?
No, because the bug should only be found in B, not A.
So how would it help users with reportbug if the bug is now on B and not A,
when they report on A ?
Mike
--
To
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:04:16AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
Doesn't that fuck up versioning tracking of the BTS ?
No, because the bug should only be found in B, not A.
So how would it help users with reportbug if the bug is now on B and not A,
Hello Don,
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Jörg Sommer wrote:
I really would like to hear you oppinion about the following matter:
Package A depends on libB. There's a bug in libB. A bug report was files
to package A, because the submitter spotted the bug in
Hi,
I really would like to hear you oppinion about the following matter:
Package A depends on libB. There's a bug in libB. A bug report was files
to package A, because the submitter spotted the bug in package A.
What would you, as maintainer of package A, do?
What do you think about leaving the
Hi Jörg,
* Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-24 13:19]:
I really would like to hear you oppinion about the following matter:
Package A depends on libB. There's a bug in libB. A bug report was files
to package A, because the submitter spotted the bug in package A.
What would you, as
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 10:56:08AM +, Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I really would like to hear you oppinion about the following matter:
Package A depends on libB. There's a bug in libB. A bug report was files
to package A, because the submitter spotted the bug in package A.
-=| Mike Hommey, Thu, 24 May 2007 19:39:20 +0200 |=-
A standard example of this are bugs in applications that are due to
bugs in libraries they depend on. Users would report bugs on the
application, but it would be reassigned to the library. Next users
reporting the bug would not see it in the
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Jörg Sommer wrote:
I really would like to hear you oppinion about the following matter:
Package A depends on libB. There's a bug in libB. A bug report was files
to package A, because the submitter spotted the bug in package A.
What would you, as maintainer of package A,
11 matches
Mail list logo