Hi,
>http://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/
thanks, I asked upstream
https://github.com/open-source-parsers/jsoncpp/issues/499
>It might be interesting to have a service like this for all Debian
>packages containing C/C++/Java libraries.
that would save a lot of segfaults and time :)
thanks,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I would like to know if upstream is using some different service now
The replacement service is here but it doesn't check jsoncpp:
http://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/
It might be interesting to have a service like this for all
Hi,
>I don't see what upstream dedication to ABI compatibility has to to with
>symbol files.
typo :)
>Anyway, the reason we're having this thread is because apparently
>libjsoncpp broke ABI without SONAME change, so maybe they're not taking
>it seriously enough. :>
actually after
* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-07-18, 11:53:
Symbols files are usually better since you get more fine grained
control of dependencies, but they take a lot more time to maintain
(especially for C++ libraries).
In this very specific case, I think we don't need it, as
Hi,
>Symbols files are usually better since you get more fine grained
>control of dependencies, but they take a lot more time to maintain
>(especially for C++ libraries).
In this very specific case, I think we don't need it, as I explained here [1]
and you can see how upstream is taking
Hi,
On Mon, 2016-07-18 at 12:48 +0200, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote:
> I would need some advice about the following bug:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820434
>
> Stephen mentioned there I should provide a shlibs minimum version.
> I am not entirely sure what that means.
> Do I
Hi!
I would need some advice about the following bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820434
Stephen mentioned there I should provide a shlibs minimum version.
I am not entirely sure what that means.
Do I need to put a file under debian/shlibs with the following line?
7 matches
Mail list logo