On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 01:39:02PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 01:29:22PM +0100, Jorge Bernal wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this helps you but, from dpkg-source(1):
> >
> > -I
> > If this option is specified, the filename will be passed to tar's
> > --exclude
>
* Justin Pryzby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> > Having a pristine tarball if possible is IMHO preferred above saving it
> > from a bit of space in your tarball.
> I agree with this, in fact. Probably best to use change it to
> 'find ./debian/'.
I agree, I find that solution great:
- I keep
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 01:19:37PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:37:07PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 07:12:54PM +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > > - Should I make my own .orig.tar.gz tarball whenever a new upstream
> > > relea
I'm not sure if this helps you but, from dpkg-source(1):
-I
If this option is specified, the filename will be passed to tar's --exclude
option when it is called to generate a .orig.tar.gz or .tar.gz file.
For example, -ICVS will make tar skip over CVS directories when generating
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 01:29:22PM +0100, Jorge Bernal wrote:
> I'm not sure if this helps you but, from dpkg-source(1):
>
> -I
> If this option is specified, the filename will be passed to tar's --exclude
>
> option when it is called to generate a .orig.tar.gz or .tar.gz file.
>
I'm not sure if this helps you but, from dpkg-source(1):
-I
If this option is specified, the filename will be passed to tar's --exclude
option when it is called to generate a .orig.tar.gz or .tar.gz file.
For example, -ICVS will make tar skip over CVS directories when generating
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:37:07PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 07:12:54PM +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > - Should I make my own .orig.tar.gz tarball whenever a new upstream
> > release is packaged? I'm planning to do that for 2.18.
> This sounds like a good ide
* Justin Pryzby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> > - Should I make my own .orig.tar.gz tarball whenever a new upstream
> > release is packaged? I'm planning to do that for 2.18.
> This sounds like a good idea. Use a makefile rule "cleancvs" (nothing
> has to depend on it, you'll just run i
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 07:12:54PM +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> - Should I simply ignore lintian, and keep the CVS entries in the
> source tree? That would let the #291206 bug opened...
Just close the bug, and override lintian. If upstream insists to
distribute CVS dirs, well, so be it
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 07:12:54PM +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Hello mentors.
> There is an issue with the upstream tarball, it includes CVS direcories
> and .cvsignore files. That's not welcome in source packages, as lintian
> says and I'd like to avoid providing all that CVS stuff.
> - S
Hello mentors.
I'm working on packaging Bugzilla 2.18 which was released a couple
of days ago, that would close the #290775 whishlist item.
There is an issue with the upstream tarball, it includes CVS direcories
and .cvsignore files. That's not welcome in source packages, as lintian
says and I'd
11 matches
Mail list logo
