On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 09:53:42AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> That said, I *really* recommend you to simply use the symlink method
> manually. It is clean, effective, hassle-free and does not bloat the diff or
> require patches. Heck, the only difference is that after you do a
>
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:40:21PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> That file recommends some best practices.
>
> You have to check what cdbs does (which is copy the autotools-dev
> files iirc) and compare that with what you do and the best practice.
>
> But if I had to recommend something no
"Carlos Z.F. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 11:54:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Read /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz please.
>>
> Thanks for the pointer. But it doesn't answer my question.
That file recommends some best practices.
You have
On Sun, 01 May 2005, Carlos Z.F. Liu wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 11:54:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Read /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz please.
> >
> Thanks for the pointer. But it doesn't answer my question.
I can't really add documentation on autotools-dev abo
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 11:54:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Read /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz please.
>
Thanks for the pointer. But it doesn't answer my question.
--
Best Regards,
Carlos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:52:21PM +1200, Carlos Z.F. Liu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In one of my packages, I relibtoolized it according the method on
> http://people.debian.org/%7Ekeybuk/libtool-updating.html. And then,
> generate a patch called 00_relibtoolize.patch. This patch will replace
> config.gu
"Carlos Z.F. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> In one of my packages, I relibtoolized it according the method on
> http://people.debian.org/%7Ekeybuk/libtool-updating.html. And then,
> generate a patch called 00_relibtoolize.patch. This patch will replace
> config.guess and config.sub
* Carlos Z.F. Liu [Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:52:21 +1200]:
> But, if I build the package, CDBS will replace these two files again.
> The problem is that config.(guess|sub).cdbs-orig are same as
> config.guess and config.sub in the final result. Is this correct?
Well, that's the way cdbs is behaving f
Hello,
In one of my packages, I relibtoolized it according the method on
http://people.debian.org/%7Ekeybuk/libtool-updating.html. And then,
generate a patch called 00_relibtoolize.patch. This patch will replace
config.guess and config.sub with a new version.
But, if I build the package, CDBS wil
9 matches
Mail list logo
