should have built the package
as you had it, but just signed it themselves. that way you would get all of
the bug mail, and the install notifications.
Otherwise, slap them around for not forwarding you mail that was sent as a
result of your package.
I believe the incorrect overrides mail
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:33:50PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe the incorrect overrides mail is sent to the uploader, not to
the maintainer. As such, it most likely went to the sponsor, who was
(correctly) the uploader for the package
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:33:50PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe the incorrect overrides mail is sent to the uploader, not to
the maintainer. As such, it most likely went to the sponsor, who
should have built the package
as you had it, but just signed it themselves. that way you would get all of
the bug mail, and the install notifications.
Otherwise, slap them around for not forwarding you mail that was sent as a
result of your package.
I believe the incorrect overrides mail
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:33:50PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe the incorrect overrides mail is sent to the uploader, not to
the maintainer. As such, it most likely went to the sponsor, who was
(correctly) the uploader for the package
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:33:50PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe the incorrect overrides mail is sent to the uploader, not to
the maintainer. As such, it most likely went to the sponsor, who
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She should have built the package
as you had it, but just signed it themselves. that way you would get all of
the bug mail, and
Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She should have built the package
as you had it, but just signed it themselves.
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 10:35:05PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She should have
it, but just signed it themselves. that way you would get all of
the bug mail, and the install notifications.
Otherwise, slap them around for not forwarding you mail that was sent as a
result of your package.
I believe the incorrect overrides mail is sent to the uploader, not to the
maintainer
Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:21:20AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
The escputil package was in section misc, but should have been in
section utils (a bug was filed to request this). I changed this, but
there has been no change in the section in the
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She should have built the package
as you had it, but just signed it themselves. that way you would get all of
the bug mail, and
Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She should have built the package
as you had it, but just signed it themselves.
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 10:35:05PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
Michael Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:49:02PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
The upload was sponsored, so perhaps the sponsor got the mail?
If they did the sponsoring badly, yes. He/She should have
it, but just signed it themselves. that way you would get all of
the bug mail, and the install notifications.
Otherwise, slap them around for not forwarding you mail that was sent as a
result of your package.
I believe the incorrect overrides mail is sent to the uploader, not to the
maintainer
The escputil package was in section misc, but should have been in
section utils (a bug was filed to request this). I changed this, but
there has been no change in the section in the archive, I assume
because the overrides weren't changed.
Do I need to file a bug against something, or notify
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:21:20AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
The escputil package was in section misc, but should have been in
section utils (a bug was filed to request this). I changed this, but
there has been no change in the section in the archive, I assume
because the overrides weren't
The escputil package was in section misc, but should have been in
section utils (a bug was filed to request this). I changed this, but
there has been no change in the section in the archive, I assume
because the overrides weren't changed.
Do I need to file a bug against something, or notify
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 12:21:20AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
The escputil package was in section misc, but should have been in
section utils (a bug was filed to request this). I changed this, but
there has been no change in the section in the archive, I assume
because the overrides weren't
19 matches
Mail list logo
