Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-31 Thread Martin Schulze
Mike Schacht wrote: This list of debian machines: http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, shows that some of the machines allow access by all. There is no further explanation of who qualifies as all, or how someone who is all can get access. The debian-admin list is given at the Admin contact

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-31 Thread Martin Schulze
Mike Schacht wrote: This list of debian machines: http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, shows that some of the machines allow access by all. There is no further explanation of who qualifies as all, or how someone who is all can get access. The debian-admin list is given at the Admin contact

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-29 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:09:56PM -0500, Mike Schacht wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:24:28PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: Another option is to use the compile farm at SourceForge. This is a bit more tricky, as you would have to be registered as a participant of one of project

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:21:57PM -0500, Mike Schacht wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 05:25:48PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: [...] If so, the build logs[1] should give you more then enough help to track your problems down before asking for another upload, and therefore triggering another

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:21:57PM -0500, Mike Schacht wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 05:25:48PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: [...] If so, the build logs[1] should give you more then enough help to track your problems down before asking for another upload, and therefore triggering another

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-28 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:09:56PM -0500, Mike Schacht wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:24:28PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: Another option is to use the compile farm at SourceForge. This is a bit more tricky, as you would have to be registered as a participant of one of project

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-28 Thread Mike Schacht
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 08:39:08AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: Using ./configure -options ... || cat config.log in debian/rules was suggested recently and could help a lot. That's brilliant! And if configure works it doesn't even fill the build logs with trash. Lovely. Done. BTW what

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Leo \Costela\ Antunes
The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information? I know this doesn't answer your question, but I assume the portability issues you mention are all build problems in one of Debian's supported architectures, am I right? If so, the build logs[1] should give you more then enough help to

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information? In this case not. In many other cases also not... Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Mike Schacht wrote: I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official distribution. I intend to apply as a NM soon, but in the meantime, since the last

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Mike Schacht wrote: I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official distribution. I intend to apply as a NM

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Schacht
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: This list of debian machines: http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, shows that some of the machines allow access by all. There is no further explanation of who qualifies as all, or how someone who is all can get access. all =

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Schacht
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:24:28PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: Another option is to use the compile farm at SourceForge. This is a bit more tricky, as you would have to be registered as a participant of one of project hosted there, but that is not a big problem. Ah, now I wonder about

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Schacht
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 05:25:48PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information? I know this doesn't answer your question, but I assume the portability issues you mention are all build problems in one of Debian's supported architectures, am I

Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Schacht
Hello, I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official distribution. I intend to apply as a NM soon, but in the meantime, since the last update of kdirstat, I am having portability problems. I have no resources for

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Leo \Costela\ Antunes
The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information? I know this doesn't answer your question, but I assume the portability issues you mention are all build problems in one of Debian's supported architectures, am I right? If so, the build logs[1] should give you more then enough help to

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Joey Hess
Mike Schacht wrote: I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official distribution. I intend to apply as a NM soon, but in the meantime, since the last update of kdirstat, I am having portability problems. I have

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information? In this case not. In many other cases also not... Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Mike Schacht wrote: I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official distribution. I intend to apply as a NM soon, but in the meantime, since the last

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Sven Luther wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Mike Schacht wrote: I am not an official debian developer, but I maintain a couple of packages. One of them, kdirstat, is already in the official distribution. I intend to apply as a NM

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Schacht
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: This list of debian machines: http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, shows that some of the machines allow access by all. There is no further explanation of who qualifies as all, or how someone who is all can get access. all =

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Schacht
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:24:28PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: Another option is to use the compile farm at SourceForge. This is a bit more tricky, as you would have to be registered as a participant of one of project hosted there, but that is not a big problem. Ah, now I wonder about

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

2003-05-27 Thread Mike Schacht
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 05:25:48PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote: The buildd-logs[1] don't provide enough debug information? I know this doesn't answer your question, but I assume the portability issues you mention are all build problems in one of Debian's supported architectures, am I