well, if nobody gives upload rights what is the difference? :)
I agree DM is not exactly from newcomers, but well, maybe DC then?
cheers,
G.
Il Lunedì 21 Settembre 2015 17:52, Jakub Wilk ha scritto:
* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2015-09-21, 15:15:
>>I would still appreciate an active DD in the
* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2015-09-21, 15:15:
I would still appreciate an active DD in the team.
you might consider applying for DM
Um, right now? Absolutely not.
DM is for experienced packagers who don't want to be DDs (yet); not for
newcomers who struggle with their first packages.
--
Jak
>I would still appreciate an active DD in the team.
you might consider applying for DM and ask somebody to give you upload
permissions :)
cheers
G.
Hi,
> When a person Orphan a package, he loses the right to complain when somebody
> steps up and maintains it :)
Well understood.
But George is one of my first users, my first packager
(although others were the DDs then), and a good friend.
So as long as there is hope to lure him out of his real
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 03:13:10PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> The production process of libburn-dbg is still a riddle to me.
> It has no .install file, just a libburn-dbg.docs.
dh_strip does that.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(bad hot key for sending mails)
yes, the packages were orphaned, you now maintain them under a team.
So the O and ITA should be closed as long as you are interested in the packages.
When a person Orphan a package, he loses the right to complain when somebody
steps
up and maintains it :)
(at
+++ Thomas Schmitt [2015-09-21 15:13 +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> Jakub Wilk wrote
> > "Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}" was necessary to squeeze->wheezy
> > upgrades; it is no longer required.
>
> Ok. No such headers. Despite online docs.
> (Were to complain about outdated wiki.debian.org articles ?)
I h
Yes
Il Lunedì 21 Settembre 2015 16:13, Thomas Schmitt ha
scritto:
Hi,
> leving them open is just "wrong" I'd say :)
I take this as a clear instruction and send mails to
79614{5,6,7}-d...@bugs.debian.org.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 02:06:36PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> "multiarch-support is inserted into Pre-Depends via ${misc:Pre-Depends}
>by dh_makeshlibs. In order to be able to remove the multiarch-supporti
>package from glibc without updating every package,
>Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pr
Hi,
> leving them open is just "wrong" I'd say :)
I take this as a clear instruction and send mails to
79614{5,6,7}-d...@bugs.debian.org.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
Hi,
i wrote:
> > (Were to complain about outdated wiki.debian.org articles ?)
Wookey wrote:
> It's a wiki - just fix it :-)
Shouldn't i have a clue of the topic first ?
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
Hi,
Jakub Wilk wrote
> "Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}" was necessary to squeeze->wheezy
> upgrades; it is no longer required.
Ok. No such headers. Despite online docs.
(Were to complain about outdated wiki.debian.org articles ?)
> > > debian-policy, "8.2 Shared library support files":
> > >
>Therefore i did not ITA the other two bug pairs after my sponsor
>showed me what i did wrong with the first attempt.
>
>Is it appropriate to ITA them while it is not clear whether
>any adoption will actually happen ?
>As said, it depends on decisions by old and new friends whom
>i do not want
Hi,
> > E: libburn4: missing-pre-dependency-on-multiarch-support
Niels Thykier wrote:
> What version of Lintian are you using?
On the kfreebsd-i386 it is Lintian v2.5.10.4.
On amd64 Sid, where i did not get the error, it is v2.5.36.1.
I am aware that the lintian on kfreebsd is outdated.
But
* Thomas Schmitt , 2015-09-21, 12:45:
while preparing the correction for a buildd failure on Debian
GNU/kFreeBSD i got a lintian complaint from kfreebsd-i386 7.9 (the
current "stable"):
E: libburn4: missing-pre-dependency-on-multiarch-support
I found
https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Impl
On 2015-09-21 12:45, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while preparing the correction for a buildd failure on Debian
> GNU/kFreeBSD i got a lintian complaint from kfreebsd-i386 7.9
> (the current "stable"):
>
> E: libburn4: missing-pre-dependency-on-multiarch-support
>
> [...]
>
>
> Have a n
Hi,
Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> can you please close 679249, 796147, 796146, 679265and so on?
I am waiting for decisions about the future maintainer team
structure. Currently there is a high-latency DD in the team
and a sponsor outside of it. I would like to lure the sponsor
into the team and/
Hi,
while preparing the correction for a buildd failure on Debian
GNU/kFreeBSD i got a lintian complaint from kfreebsd-i386 7.9
(the current "stable"):
E: libburn4: missing-pre-dependency-on-multiarch-support
I found
https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation#dh.281.29_and_autotools
18 matches
Mail list logo
