Re: Need experienced perl module maintainer for a second pair of eyes on my package

2001-10-13 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [snip] Even which pure_install, the empty dir is created. I don't understand the difference from pure_install to install anyway, the rules file of the package I used as an example last year invoked pure_install. I found out why I don't have to remove

Re: Need experienced perl module maintainer for a second pair of eyes on my package

2001-10-13 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 10:11:30 -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even which pure_install, the empty dir is created. I don't understand the difference from pure_install to install anyway, the rules file of the package I used as an example last year invoked pure_install. I

Re: Need experienced perl module maintainer for a second pair of eyes on my package

2001-10-13 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [snip] Even which pure_install, the empty dir is created. I don't understand the difference from pure_install to install anyway, the rules file of the package I used as an example last year invoked pure_install. I found out why I don't have to remove empty

Re: Need experienced perl module maintainer for a second pair of eyes on my package

2001-10-13 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 10:11:30 -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even which pure_install, the empty dir is created. I don't understand the difference from pure_install to install anyway, the rules file of the package I used as an example last year invoked pure_install. I found

Re: Need experienced perl module maintainer for a second pair of eyes on my package

2001-10-09 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 7 Oct 2001 10:26:10 -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: - Why is there an empty /usr/lib/perl5 directory in your package? Because the Makefile generated by MakeMaker makes that directory on install. I now delete it after

Re: Need experienced perl module maintainer for a second pair of eyes on my package

2001-10-09 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 7 Oct 2001 10:26:10 -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: - Why is there an empty /usr/lib/perl5 directory in your package? Because the Makefile generated by MakeMaker makes that directory on install. I now delete it after

Re: Need experienced perl module maintainer for a second pair of eyes on my package

2001-10-07 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I really appreciate the comments, thanks. You're welcome. [snip] - Why is there an empty /usr/lib/perl5 directory in your package? Because the Makefile generated by MakeMaker makes that directory on install. I now delete it after installation. Any

Re: Need experienced perl module maintainer for a second pair of eyes on my package

2001-10-07 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I really appreciate the comments, thanks. You're welcome. [snip] - Why is there an empty /usr/lib/perl5 directory in your package? Because the Makefile generated by MakeMaker makes that directory on install. I now delete it after installation. Any

Re: Need experienced perl module maintainer for a second pair of eyes on my package

2001-10-05 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Hi, I looked at your package and have following comments and suggestions: - The Build-Depends should be on debhelper (= 3.0.18) per policy. - Why is there an empty /usr/lib/perl5 directory in your package? - Please remove the 'local' at the bottom of the changelog (using the dpkg-dev-el

Re: Need experienced perl module maintainer for a second pair of eyes on my package

2001-10-05 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Hi, I looked at your package and have following comments and suggestions: - The Build-Depends should be on debhelper (= 3.0.18) per policy. - Why is there an empty /usr/lib/perl5 directory in your package? - Please remove the 'local' at the bottom of the changelog (using the dpkg-dev-el

Re: Need experienced perl module maintainer for a second pair of eyes on my package

2001-10-05 Thread Marc Haber
I really appreciate the comments, thanks. On Fri, 5 Oct 2001 08:36:45 -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - The Build-Depends should be on debhelper (= 3.0.18) per policy. Fixed. - Why is there an empty /usr/lib/perl5 directory in your package? Because the Makefile generated

Need experienced perl module maintainer for a second pair of eyes on my package

2001-10-04 Thread Marc Haber
Hi, I don't have any experience with perl module packages, and I usually work under potato which has a quite different perl policy. I'd appreciate if anybody who knows how to build perl packages on sid would take a look at my libnet-ipnetmember-perl package from