Colin Watson wrote:
> It seems to me that this requirement is a relic of the times before
> OpenMotif was packaged. At that point it was sensible to require
> statically linked versions of Motif applications so that Debian users
> could use them without having to get hold of a version of Motif
> th
Colin Watson wrote:
> It seems to me that this requirement is a relic of the times before
> OpenMotif was packaged. At that point it was sensible to require
> statically linked versions of Motif applications so that Debian users
> could use them without having to get hold of a version of Motif
> t
Bastian Kleineidam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
> to have your package.
But a package statically linked to OpenMotif must still not go into
main. Not installing libmotif to keep your system free but installing
it when bundled
Bastian Kleineidam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
> to have your package.
But a package statically linked to OpenMotif must still not go into
main. Not installing libmotif to keep your system free but installing
it when bundled
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 02:24:23PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> > Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
> > to have your package.
> Ok. So my package should contain 2 binary packages, one linked
> statically and one dynamically, but
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:10:55PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> My problem is: snd doesn't work well with lesstif according to the
> upstream maintainer, the gtk-gui isn't as mature as the motif-gui, so I
> have to use open motif (libmotif). The policy states that such a p
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 02:24:23PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> > Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
> > to have your package.
> Ok. So my package should contain 2 binary packages, one linked
> statically and one dynamically, bu
Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
> to have your package.
Ok. So my package should contain 2 binary packages, one linked
statically and one dynamically, but both to libmotif. I don't have to
make a version with lesstif, do I?
> Non-
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:10:55PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> But I don't understand why I also have to make both a statically and a
> dynamically linked version of the package, as reqested by 12.8.
Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
to have your pack
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:10:55PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> My problem is: snd doesn't work well with lesstif according to the
> upstream maintainer, the gtk-gui isn't as mature as the motif-gui, so I
> have to use open motif (libmotif). The policy states that such a p
Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
> to have your package.
Ok. So my package should contain 2 binary packages, one linked
statically and one dynamically, but both to libmotif. I don't have to
make a version with lesstif, do I?
> Non
Hello,
I'd like to make a new package for snd. The current maintainer told me
that he would sponsor me.
My problem is: snd doesn't work well with lesstif according to the
upstream maintainer, the gtk-gui isn't as mature as the motif-gui, so I
have to use open motif (libmot
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:10:55PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> But I don't understand why I also have to make both a statically and a
> dynamically linked version of the package, as reqested by 12.8.
Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
to have your pac
Hello,
I'd like to make a new package for snd. The current maintainer told me
that he would sponsor me.
My problem is: snd doesn't work well with lesstif according to the
upstream maintainer, the gtk-gui isn't as mature as the motif-gui, so I
have to use open motif (libmot
14 matches
Mail list logo
