Re: Package names and perl

2001-12-07 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:37:33PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote: As I understand the perl-policy, all packages that contain perl modules are to be named in the form libfoo-bar-perl. I'm working on a program called SpamAssassin. While it contains perl modules, its primary purpose is for its

Re: Package names and perl

2001-12-07 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As I understand the perl-policy, all packages that contain perl modules are to be named in the form libfoo-bar-perl. From my understanding, these are the perl equivalent of a shared library. So the same rule should apply: Only package it seperately, if

Package names and perl

2001-12-06 Thread Duncan Findlay
As I understand the perl-policy, all packages that contain perl modules are to be named in the form libfoo-bar-perl. I'm working on a program called SpamAssassin. While it contains perl modules, its primary purpose is for its scripts. Furthermore, it contains one binary written in C, so it