On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 23:24, Russ Allberyr...@debian.org wrote:
We had a specific request for Lintian to not warn about UNRELEASED as the
distribution so that people could run it on each build and know that any
output meant a problem. Unfortunately, that creates the possibility for
On 20/08/09 at 22:45 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:39:44PM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
The changes file says Distribution: unstable:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/velvet/news/20090819T133220Z.html
Very good point. So only the changelog is borken.
I built
On Sun, Aug 23 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I had a package rejected out of NEW because of that (same case:
UNRELEASED in changelog, Distribution: unstable in .changes). Being
curious, I asked ftpmasters why it this was a problem (besides not being
very beautiful), but didn't get an answer.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 02:42:17PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I had a package rejected out of NEW because of that (same case:
UNRELEASED in changelog, Distribution: unstable in .changes). Being
curious, I asked ftpmasters why it this was a
Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org writes:
He meant that in this particular case, the UNRELEASED and unstabler
discrepancy *is* in the .changes file. See
http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/velvet/news/20090819T133220Z.html
Yeah, Charles also pointed that out to me. I get it now -- that's
definitely
Le Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:32:20PM +, Archive Administrator a écrit :
Accepted:
velvet-example_0.7.50-1_all.deb
to pool/main/v/velvet/velvet-example_0.7.50-1_all.deb
velvet_0.7.50-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/v/velvet/velvet_0.7.50-1.diff.gz
velvet_0.7.50-1.dsc
to
The changes file says Distribution: unstable:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/velvet/news/20090819T133220Z.html
No idea how you did that nor what the consequences are.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Le Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:39:44PM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
The changes file says Distribution: unstable:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/velvet/news/20090819T133220Z.html
Very good point. So only the changelog is borken.
I built the package with its UNRELEASED changelog with sbuild, which
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Very good point. So only the changelog is borken.
I built the package with its UNRELEASED changelog with sbuild, which
puts the schroot's name in the Distribution field of the changes control
file. The inconsistency with the changelog went unnoticed
Hi
Dne Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:24:40 -0700
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org napsal(a):
We had a specific request for Lintian to not warn about UNRELEASED as the
distribution so that people could run it on each build and know that any
output meant a problem. Unfortunately, that creates the
Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org writes:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org napsal(a):
We had a specific request for Lintian to not warn about UNRELEASED as
the distribution so that people could run it on each build and know
that any output meant a problem. Unfortunately, that creates the
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:54:29PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org writes:
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org napsal(a):
We had a specific request for Lintian to not warn about UNRELEASED as
the distribution so that people could run it on each build and know
that any
12 matches
Mail list logo
