RFS: pysol, pysol-cardsets, pysol-sound-server

2003-05-13 Thread Alexander Nofftz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Folks! Thanks to the aid of mentors.debian.net, my adopted and bugfixed packages are now downloadable at: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main apt-get source pysol pysol-cardsets pysol-sound-server But I'm

PySol

2003-04-07 Thread Anthony Hurd
I will sponsor this package, but first you must hand over the antidote.

RFS: PySol

2003-03-23 Thread Alexander Nofftz
Hi! As the bug in TKinter is fixed now, there's nothing that prevents PySol 4.81 from going into Unstable. However I'm still looking for a sponsor. You can get my packages at: http://server.alexnofftz.de/~alex/pysol/ Thanks in advance, Alex -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

RFS: PySol

2003-03-23 Thread Alexander Nofftz
Hi! As the bug in TKinter is fixed now, there's nothing that prevents PySol 4.81 from going into Unstable. However I'm still looking for a sponsor. You can get my packages at: http://server.alexnofftz.de/~alex/pysol/ Thanks in advance, Alex -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Re: PySol

2003-04-15 Thread Alexander Nofftz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Anthony! Am Montag, 7. April 2003 15:22 schrieb Anthony Hurd: > I will sponsor this package, but first > you must hand over the antidote. My PySol package files have now been corrected and are ready for checking and upload:

Re: PySol

2003-04-19 Thread Alexander Nofftz
Hi! Am Montag, 2003-04-07 15:22 schrieb Anthony Hurd: > I will sponsor this package, but first > you must hand over the antidote. Anthony didn't answer my messages yet. Is there another one for sponsoring me? My PySol packages are available at deb http://server.alexnofftz.de/

RFS: PySol packages

2003-03-15 Thread Alexander Nofftz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Folks! I just finished my first Debian packages: pysol_4.81-1_all.deb pysol-sounds_4.81-1_all.deb pysol-cardsets_4.40-2_all.deb http://server.alexnofftz.de/~alex/pysol/ Now I need a sponsor to check and (hopefully) upload them. Note

RFS: PySol packages

2003-03-15 Thread Alexander Nofftz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Folks! I just finished my first Debian packages: pysol_4.81-1_all.deb pysol-sounds_4.81-1_all.deb pysol-cardsets_4.40-2_all.deb http://server.alexnofftz.de/~alex/pysol/ Now I need a sponsor to check and (hopefully) upload them. Note

Looking for sponsor: pysol

2003-03-03 Thread Yusei TAHARA
I'm looking for a sponsor for pysol, pysol-cardsets, pysol-sound-server. pysol is X11 solitaire game written in Python. these package are orphaned, I wolud like to take it and want to become a new maintainer. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=182930

Re: RFS: PySol packages

2003-03-15 Thread Alexander Nofftz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Am Samstag, 15. März 2003 16:26 schrieb Alexander Nofftz: > I just finished my first Debian packages: > > pysol_4.81-1_all.deb > pysol-sounds_4.81-1_all.deb > pysol-cardsets_4.40-2_all.deb The PySol sound server 3.0

Re: RFS: PySol packages

2003-03-17 Thread Alexander Nofftz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Am Samstag, 15. März 2003 16:26 schrieb Alexander Nofftz: > Note: PySol 4.81 currently doesn't work with tk8.4 8.4.2-2 from Sid. > tk8.4 8.4.0-5 of Testing works fine. See also bugs #184832 and #184609. This is definitely a bug in T

Looking for sponsor: pysol

2003-03-03 Thread Yusei TAHARA
I'm looking for a sponsor for pysol, pysol-cardsets, pysol-sound-server. pysol is X11 solitaire game written in Python. these package are orphaned, I wolud like to take it and want to become a new maintainer. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=182930

Re: RFS: PySol packages

2003-03-15 Thread Alexander Nofftz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Am Samstag, 15. März 2003 16:26 schrieb Alexander Nofftz: > I just finished my first Debian packages: > > pysol_4.81-1_all.deb > pysol-sounds_4.81-1_all.deb > pysol-cardsets_4.40-2_all.deb The PySol sound server 3.0

Re: RFS: PySol packages

2003-03-17 Thread Alexander Nofftz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Am Samstag, 15. März 2003 16:26 schrieb Alexander Nofftz: > Note: PySol 4.81 currently doesn't work with tk8.4 8.4.2-2 from Sid. > tk8.4 8.4.0-5 of Testing works fine. See also bugs #184832 and #184609. This is definitely a bug in T

Bug#976353: RFS: python-pysol-cards/0.10.1-1 [ITP] -- Deal PySol FC Cards

2020-12-03 Thread Juhani Numminen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-pysol-cards": * Package name : python-pysol-cards Version : 0.10.1-1 Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish, https://www.shlomifish.org/ * URL

Still no sponsor for PySol

2003-04-07 Thread Alexander Nofftz
Hi Folks! I've still not found a sponsor for my adopted PySol packages. There are still arriving new bug reports in the BTS for PySol that I've allready fixed in the new version. deb[-src] http://server.alexnofftz.de/~alex/pysol/ ./ I've signed my GPG key by a DD, but I

Looking for PySol sponsor (again)

2003-05-02 Thread Alexander Nofftz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Folks! I've been lost upon looking for somebody to sponsor my adopted PySol packages for more than a month now. My four new packages will close 16 bug reports, additionally the last update of PySol was a NMU dated December 2001!! Please h

Re: Still no sponsor for PySol

2003-04-07 Thread Roger Ward
Why are you not uploading his source, with Debian patches in a .diff? Is your package IMPOSSIBLE to deliver this way? -Roger Quoting Alexander Nofftz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Folks! > > I've still not found a sponsor for my adopted PySol packages. There are still &

Re: Still no sponsor for PySol

2003-04-07 Thread Alexander Nofftz
st. Here my original answer: > Quoting Alexander Nofftz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi Roger! > > > > Am Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 02:08:46PM -0400 schrieb Roger Ward: > > > Why are you not uploading his source, with Debian patches in a .diff? > > >

Re: Still no sponsor for PySol

2003-04-13 Thread Alexander Nofftz
pache and how it is built. Many different patches, tars, etc are > combined from one huge .orig.tar.gz (NOT just true apache sourcecode, but > ALL the sorcecode is inside this tarball... all modules, etc). I've now seperated the three sources into .orig.tar.gz and .diff.gz: http://se

Re: Still no sponsor for PySol

2003-04-14 Thread Roger Ward
take > > a look at Apache and how it is built. Many different patches, tars, etc > are > > combined from one huge .orig.tar.gz (NOT just true apache sourcecode, but > > ALL the sorcecode is inside this tarball... all modules, etc). > > I've now seperated the three sou

Re: Still no sponsor for PySol

2003-04-14 Thread Alexander Nofftz
of Adam Klein. The upstream sources can be found at: http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/pysol/ > How are you generating the .diff.gz files? dpkg-buildpackage should name them > something like: pysol_4.81.orig.tar.gz and pysol_4.81-1.diff.gz. If anyone > knows a better way than dpkg-build

Re: Still no sponsor for PySol

2003-04-14 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Alexander Nofftz wrote: >>How are you generating the .diff.gz files? dpkg-buildpackage should name them >>something like: pysol_4.81.orig.tar.gz and pysol_4.81-1.diff.gz. If anyone >>knows a better way than dpkg-buildpackage to generate the diff let me know... > I generated them manually by usin

Re: Still no sponsor for PySol

2003-04-14 Thread Roger Ward
Quoting Alexander Nofftz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm packaging it, adopting the debianized version of Adam Klein. The > upstream > sources can be found at: http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/pysol/ > > > How are you generating the .diff.gz files? > > I ge

Re: Still no sponsor for PySol

2003-04-14 Thread David Lloyd
Roger et al, > Again, I would reccomend using dpkg-buildpackage, even if you only > intend to generate the source upload. If you name the source tarball > (upstream source) _.orig.tar.gz and are in the source > tree (with /debian/ setup) it should generate the .diff.gz based on > the last change

Re: Still no sponsor for PySol

2003-04-14 Thread Roger Ward
At the risk of CC'ing too many people: Quoting David Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Roger et al, > > > Again, I would reccomend using dpkg-buildpackage, even if you only > > intend to generate the source upload. If you name the source tarball > > (upstream source) _.orig.tar.gz and are in the

Re: Still no sponsor for PySol

2003-04-15 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 10:43:12AM +0930, David Lloyd wrote: > Roger et al, > > Again, I would reccomend using dpkg-buildpackage, even if you only > > intend to generate the source upload. If you name the source tarball > > (upstream source) _.orig.tar.gz and are in the source > > tree (with /debi

Re: Still no sponsor for PySol

2003-04-15 Thread Alexander Nofftz
than dpkg-buildpackage to generate the diff let > me know... Got it. I named the upstream sources like pysol-4.81.orig.tar.gz (dash instead of underscrore), so dpkg-source didn't find them and created a new tarball. I've rebuild everything and put it on http://server.alexnofftz.de/~

Re: Still no sponsor for PySol

2003-04-15 Thread Paul Cupis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 15 Apr 2003 12:54, Alexander Nofftz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However I got a warning from dpkg-source that the original source of > pysol-cardsets_4.40 will not be provided with pysol-cardsets_4.40-2. > Has this somet

Re: Still no sponsor for PySol

2003-04-15 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, > However I got a warning from dpkg-source that the original source of > pysol-cardsets_4.40 will not be provided with pysol-cardsets_4.40-2. Has this > something to do with the -2, the second Debian release? > Yes. See the manpage, which also documents the option to force

RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)

2010-09-17 Thread Bernhard Reiter
ry package: pysolfc The package appears to be lintian and pbuilder clean. A previous version has already been included in Ubuntu. The upload would fix this bug: 519752 My motivation for maintaining this package is: Its (unmaintained) predecessor pysol dropped out of debian a while ago; pysolfc is cons

RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)

2011-03-11 Thread Bernhard Reiter
ry package: pysolfc The package appears to be lintian and pbuilder clean. A previous version has already been included in Ubuntu. The upload would fix this bug: 519752 My motivation for maintaining this package is: Its (unmaintained) predecessor pysol dropped out of debian a while ago; pysolfc is cons

RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)

2011-08-20 Thread Bernhard Reiter
1.dsc The package appears to be lintian and pbuilder clean. A previous version has already been included in Ubuntu. The upload would fix this bug: 519752 My motivation for maintaining this package is: Its (unmaintained) predecessor pysol dropped out of debian a while ago; pysolfc is considered one o

RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)

2011-09-21 Thread Bernhard Reiter
1.dsc The package appears to be lintian and pbuilder clean. A previous version has already been included in Ubuntu. The upload would fix this bug: 519752 My motivation for maintaining this package is: Its (unmaintained) predecessor pysol dropped out of debian a while ago; pysolfc is considered one o

RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)

2011-11-23 Thread Bernhard Reiter
this package is: Its (unmaintained) predecessor pysol dropped out of debian a while ago; pysolfc is considered one of the best versatile solitaire collections. It is already part of Ubuntu, but I'd rather maintain it via Debian. Other relevant location(s): - Git: git://git.debian.org/git/pk

Re: RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)

2011-03-11 Thread Luke Faraone
t does not have an original tarball. You note that you conflict with pysol (<< 10). I'm confused as to why, since your package does not actually conflict with pysol; they can certainly be unpacked at the same time. Is there a reason they cannot be installed concurrently as well? (if so, you w

Re: RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)

2011-12-01 Thread Jakub Wilk
/pysolfc/pysolfc_2.0-1.dsc (I don't intend to sponsor this package.) Lintian says: W: pysol: transitional-package-should-be-oldlibs-extra oldlibs/optional I: pysolfc: conflicts-with-version pysol (<< 1:2.0-1) I: pysolfc: conflicts-with-version pysol-cardsets (<< 1:2.0+dfsg-1) X:

Re: RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)

2011-12-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Bernhard Reiter wrote: > * Package name    : pysolfc > * Description     : A Python solitaire game collection A comment from IRC: ockham: I don't know, I'm not a DD. But looking at the data files, I don't believe the copyright statements. For example, cardset-

Re: RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)

2011-12-02 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Bernhard Reiter , 2011-11-23, 13:49: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pysolfc Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pysolfc/pysolfc_2.0-1.dsc One more thing: python is needed in the clean target, so

Re: RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)

2011-12-05 Thread Bernhard Reiter
Am Freitag, den 02.12.2011, 02:08 +0100 schrieb Jakub Wilk: > (I don't intend to sponsor this package.) Thank you anyway for taking the time to review! > Lintian says: > > W: pysol: transitional-package-should-be-oldlibs-extra oldlibs/optional > I: pysolfc: conflicts-with

Re: RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)

2011-12-05 Thread Steve Cotton
ight identified them as such. > > > I've tried to contact T. Kirk by the e-mail address (grania@...) given > in the source, but it's dead, which is no surprise, as his contributions > are more than ten years old. > > What do I do now? > > Bernhard Hi Bernhar

Re: Re: RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)

2011-12-05 Thread Bernhard Reiter
Paul Wise , Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:14:42 +0800: > A comment from IRC: > > ockham: I don't know, I'm not a DD. But looking at the > data files, I don't believe the copyright statements. For example, > cardset-vienna-2k looks to be scanned drawings by a professional > artist, while cardset-tuxedo is

Re: Re: RFS: pysolfc (replacement for removed package: pysol)

2011-12-07 Thread Bernhard Reiter
Steve Cotton, Tue, 6 Dec 2011 01:43:13 +: > Hi Bernhard, > > Thanks for following up with T. Kirk. > > Found something that looks helpful - some of the PySol cards > turned up elsewhere in Debian, with detail about the copyright. > > kdegames-card-data has several