Question on why package was rebuilt

2024-02-15 Thread Loren M. Lang
Hello, I recently had a package sponsors and entered into unstable called tiv. It can be seen here: https://packages.debian.org/sid/tiv Everything went OK, but I see that the amd64 arch package appears to have been re-built for some reason. It's version is showing up with a +b1. I am curious if

Re: Question on why package was rebuilt

2024-02-15 Thread Mathias Gibbens
On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 16:20 -0800, Loren M. Lang wrote: > Hello, > > I recently had a package sponsors and entered into unstable called tiv. > It can be seen here: > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/tiv > > Everything went OK, but I see that the amd64 arch package appears to > have been re-buil

Re: Question on why package was rebuilt

2024-02-16 Thread Jérémy Lal
Le ven. 16 févr. 2024 à 04:03, Mathias Gibbens a écrit : > On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 16:20 -0800, Loren M. Lang wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I recently had a package sponsors and entered into unstable called tiv. > > It can be seen here: > > > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/tiv > > > > Everything wen

Re: Question on why package was rebuilt

2024-02-16 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi On 2024-02-16 21:32:49 +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > When a package is uploaded to NEW, you have to upload both the source > > and binary package(s) for review. After the package is accepted, the > > buildds auto-build for any other architectures that don't already have > > a binary package. Mig