RE: Appeal to follow up on sponsor/advocate requests

2002-06-26 Thread tony mancill
FWIW, I typically respond via private email too. Perhaps we should resurrect http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/ (which still functions, but seems to be outdated), or try using the RFS suggestion someone recently posted? On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > On 25-Ju

RE: Appeal to follow up on sponsor/advocate requests

2002-06-25 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 25-Jun-2002 Ben Armstrong wrote: > Hi, > > Looking over the past month or so of debian-mentors, I'm seeing that quite a > number of people's appeals for sponsorship or advocacy are apparently > falling on deaf ears (unless these are being answered only in private > email). If regulars here wo

Re: Appeal to follow up on sponsor/advocate requests

2002-06-25 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:37:13PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote: > One thing I would like to have comments on though is the possible > section of my package nvrec, which is dependent on liblame and the > question if can be put into debian in the first place. With some reengineering of nvrec, perhaps.

Re: Appeal to follow up on sponsor/advocate requests

2002-06-25 Thread Marc Leeman
> could keep on top of these. I have tried to get the ball rolling by > answering a couple of sponsorship requests today, but there are several > others with subjects containing "sponsor", "RFS", or in one case "spronsor". Sure, take your time :) I already had some _very_ good comments and sugge

RE: Appeal to follow up on sponsor/advocate requests

2002-06-25 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 25-Jun-2002 Ben Armstrong wrote: > Hi, > > Looking over the past month or so of debian-mentors, I'm seeing that quite a > number of people's appeals for sponsorship or advocacy are apparently > falling on deaf ears (unless these are being answered only in private > email). If regulars here w

Re: Appeal to follow up on sponsor/advocate requests

2002-06-25 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:37:13PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote: > One thing I would like to have comments on though is the possible > section of my package nvrec, which is dependent on liblame and the > question if can be put into debian in the first place. With some reengineering of nvrec, perhaps.

Re: Appeal to follow up on sponsor/advocate requests

2002-06-25 Thread Marc Leeman
> could keep on top of these. I have tried to get the ball rolling by > answering a couple of sponsorship requests today, but there are several > others with subjects containing "sponsor", "RFS", or in one case "spronsor". Sure, take your time :) I already had some _very_ good comments and sugg