Re: Is this really the debian way ?

2014-02-09 Thread Craig Small
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 07:13:59PM +, Roelof Wobben wrote: On the control file these packages are made: cjs - Mozilla-based javascript bindings for the GNOME platform libcjs0c - This is the shared library applications link to libcjs-dev - This package contains the development files

Re: Is this really the debian way ?

2014-02-09 Thread Eric L.
Hi, On 08/02/14 20:13, Roelof Wobben wrote: So they have to use some sort of hack to find the files of the second package. If this is the way Debian wants the packages, how can I do the same with dh7. Not too sure about this part and what the actual question is... All the parts are of a

RE: Is this really the debian way ?

2014-02-09 Thread Roelof Wobben
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 23:00:49 +1100 From: csm...@debian.org To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Is this really the debian way ? On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 07:13:59PM +, Roelof Wobben wrote: On the control file these packages are made

RE: Is this really the debian way ?

2014-02-09 Thread Roelof Wobben
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 13:13:09 +0100 From: ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Is this really the debian way ? Hi, On 08/02/14 20:13, Roelof Wobben wrote: So they have to use some sort of hack to find

Re: Is this really the debian way ?

2014-02-09 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2014-02-08, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote: DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_libcjs0c = -Xusr/lib/cjs-1.0/ -V'libcjs0c (= $(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION)), libcjs0-$(LIBMOZJS)' -- -c4 I don't see anything wrong here. It is not in the 'beginners end' of library packaging, and library packaging is not

RE: Is this really the debian way ?

2014-02-09 Thread Roelof Wobben
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org From: nos...@vuorela.dk Subject: Re: Is this really the debian way ? Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 15:10:26 + On 2014-02-08, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote: DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_libcjs0c = -Xusr/lib/cjs-1.0

RE: Is this really the debian way ?

2014-02-09 Thread Roelof Wobben
From: rwob...@hotmail.com To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: Is this really the debian way ? Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 18:54:02 + To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org From: nos...@vuorela.dk

Re: Is this really the debian way ?

2014-02-09 Thread Craig Small
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 03:10:26PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2014-02-08, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote: DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_libcjs0c = -Xusr/lib/cjs-1.0/ -V'libcjs0c (= $(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION)), libcjs0-$(LIBMOZJS)' -- -c4 In this case, it ensures that anything that links

Re: Is this really the debian way ?

2014-02-09 Thread Craig Small
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 12:14:17PM +, Roelof Wobben wrote: I know that cjs depends on mozjs185 package. Is there a better way to make this work ? Without the hack ? cjs the program or libcjs0? Whichever one, add a Dependency. As you're running objdump over a library libcjs0 to find what