Hey again,
Jonas Meurer:
>>> So here's the idea we came up with: We could explicitely broaden the
>>> scope of debian-mentors to include any questions regarding Debian
>>> infrastructure software.
>>> That basicly would mean to explicitely mention "questions on
>>> infrastruc-ture projects" in
Hello,
Jonas Meurer:
> Jonas Meurer:
>> So here's the idea we came up with: We could explicitely broaden the
>> scope of debian-mentors to include any questions regarding Debian
>> infrastructure software.
>> That basicly would mean to explicitely mention "questions on
>> infrastruc-ture
Hi again,
Jonas Meurer:
> So here's the idea we came up with: We could explicitely broaden the
> scope of debian-mentors to include any questions regarding Debian
> infrastructure software.
> That basicly would mean to explicitely mention "questions on
> infrastruc-ture projects" in our docs
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> […]
I'm not sure whether this particular sub-thread is salvagable but I
thought I might briefly share the below in order that it might prevent
parallel cases elsewhere.
There exists a particular argument style where one participant in the
discussion asks a collection of
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 6:17 AM Sam Hartman wrote:
> I wonder whether it might be a good idea to write down which
> infrastructure services people in the mentors community are most able to
> help with. I don't want to discourage people from for example asking
> dak questions, but it might be
Paul, it's really cool to see that you are open to this.
I wonder whether it might be a good idea to write down which
infrastructure services people in the mentors community are most able to
help with. I don't want to discourage people from for example asking
dak questions, but it might be
Adrian Bunk writes:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 02:56:53PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
>> Adrian Bunk writes:
>> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 12:55:14PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>>...
>> >> [1] Let me give two examples for such "infrastructure projects":
>> >> */ Many in Debian agree that
On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 02:56:53PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 12:55:14PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>...
> >> [1] Let me give two examples for such "infrastructure projects":
> >> */ Many in Debian agree that Debbugs could need some love, but
Adrian Bunk writes:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 12:55:14PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Jonas,
>
>>...
>> So here's the idea we came up with: We could explicitely broaden the
>> scope of debian-mentors to include any questions regarding Debian
>> infrastructure software.
>> That
On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 02:44:40PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 12:55:14PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Jonas,
Hello both mailinglists,
> >...
> > So here's the idea we came up with: We could explicitely broaden the
> > scope of debian-mentors to include
On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 12:55:14PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Jonas,
>...
> So here's the idea we came up with: We could explicitely broaden the
> scope of debian-mentors to include any questions regarding Debian
> infrastructure software.
> That basicly would mean to explicitely
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 6:55 PM Jonas Meurer wrote:
> My hope is that having debian-mentors as an endorsed entry point for
> diving into Debian infrastructure would lower the entry barrier
> significantly for new contributors who'd like to dive into our
> infrastructure software projects.
>
> What
Hi,
During MiniDebConf in Hamburg, I had an interesting conversation about
the question of how we can attract more people to contribute to Debian
infrastructure projects. There seems to be some consensus that such
infrastructure projects are the ones in Debian that most badly need
more
13 matches
Mail list logo
