Re: RFH lintian too hush

2004-10-14 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 10:26:13PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: But I was looking for the hugh /usr/share so I tried lintian -C hus conglomerate_0.7.14-1_powerpc.deb Two snippets from the lintian manual page -C chk1,chk2,..., --check-part chk1,chk2,... Run only

Re: RFH lintian too hush

2004-10-14 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 10:26:13PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: But I was looking for the hugh /usr/share so I tried lintian -C hus conglomerate_0.7.14-1_powerpc.deb Two snippets from the lintian manual page -C chk1,chk2,..., --check-part chk1,chk2,... Run only

Re: RFH lintian too hush

2004-08-29 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 12:09:10PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 03:35:14AM -0400, Randall Donald wrote: hi, Hello ftpmaster, (Hello ftpmasters, ;-) Hello debian-mentors, E: conglomerate: no-copyright-file W: conglomerate: non-standard-dir-perm usr/ 0775 !=

Re: RFH lintian too hush

2004-08-29 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 12:09:10PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: I'm surprised that your lintian procedures more information then mine. According to packages.qa.debian.org is the most recent version 1.23.2, I use that version

Re: RFH lintian too hush

2004-08-29 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:26:35PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: snip what=warnings found by others, but by me/ According the manual page of lintian is there a check for huge /usr/share. Conglomerate 0.7.14-1[1] is about

Re: RFH lintian too hush

2004-08-29 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Diverting to lintain-maint, where this is more appropriate... On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 10:26:13PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:26:35PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: snip what=warnings found by

Re: RFH lintian too hush

2004-08-29 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 12:09:10PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 03:35:14AM -0400, Randall Donald wrote: hi, Hello ftpmaster, (Hello ftpmasters, ;-) Hello debian-mentors, E: conglomerate: no-copyright-file W: conglomerate: non-standard-dir-perm usr/ 0775 !=

Re: RFH lintian too hush

2004-08-29 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 12:09:10PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: I'm surprised that your lintian procedures more information then mine. According to packages.qa.debian.org is the most recent version 1.23.2, I use that version

Re: RFH lintian too hush

2004-08-29 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:26:35PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: snip what=warnings found by others, but by me/ According the manual page of lintian is there a check for huge /usr/share. Conglomerate 0.7.14-1[1] is about

Re: RFH lintian too hush

2004-08-29 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Diverting to lintain-maint, where this is more appropriate... On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 10:26:13PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:26:35PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: snip what=warnings found by