On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 09:15:37AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hi,
> let's restart from scratch, concentrating on the packaging side of the story.
OK, Also added Felipe in CC.
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 22:53, Julien Viard de Galbert
> wrote:
> > Dear mentors and mentees,
> >
> > I am looking fo
Hi,
let's restart from scratch, concentrating on the packaging side of the story.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 22:53, Julien Viard de Galbert
wrote:
> Dear mentors and mentees,
>
> I am looking for reviews for my package "webalizer"
>
> The previous maintainer Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) agreed t
On 01/16/2011 01:24 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> Maybe our confusion comes from the fact that Jonathan seems to ask
> about a _review_ (and not an upload) and you were already thinking
> about potential spnsorship in the future?
>
Yes, I am making the proposal to be the sponsor, because I need
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:39:53 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 01/15/2011 03:54 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > I don't agree here; I've seen and been involved in quite a few
> > maintainer handovers that worked perfectly without involving the BTS.
> >
> > Of course if the new maintainer needs a sp
On 01/15/2011 02:02 AM, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote:
> I didn't want to offense you in any way by saying you might not be
> familiar with git. I'm sorry if it sounded like that...
>
Did it sound like I was offended ? I was not! :)
> I see your point with branch names.
> But I don't think there
On 01/15/2011 03:54 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> I don't agree here; I've seen and been involved in quite a few
> maintainer handovers that worked perfectly without involving the BTS.
>
> Of course if the new maintainer needs a sponsor, the sponsor will
> want to see some proof of the old maintaine
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 00:05:20 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> The way that the previous maintainer would declare that he doesn't
> want to maintain would be a RFA (Request For Adoption).
> The way you would adopt it would be to do an ITA (Intention To Package)
> by renaming his RFA and take-over the
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:05:20AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 01/14/2011 10:45 PM, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote:
> > Well the maintainer has agreed (on private mail) to give it to me, and
> > I'm planning to ask him to sponsor it so my understanding was that we
> > could avoid the bureaucra
In <4d307440.30...@debian.org>, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>Exactly since when, a private email is an official document for a change
>of maintainership in Debian? What are RFA, O, and ITA for then? I think
>you are mistaking Gregor, it's not enough.
It should be. The bugs types are for when communicat
On 01/14/2011 10:45 PM, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote:
> Well the maintainer has agreed (on private mail) to give it to me, and
> I'm planning to ask him to sponsor it so my understanding was that we
> could avoid the bureaucracy...
>
The way that the previous maintainer would declare that he d
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:45:57 +0100, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote:
> > If you are adopting the package, then you should close a bug for it
> > (the package should be orphaned, then the bug should be renamed as
> > "ITA" (Intention To Adopt), then you should close it in your changelog).
> Well the
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 04:58:37PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
> Hi,
Hello,
>
> First of all, thanks for your interest in Webalizer. I'm a heavy user
> of it, and it's nice that you seem to want to take over the maintenance
> of this left-over. Let me give few comments...
>
Thanks for loo
On 01/14/2011 05:53 AM, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote:
> Dear mentors and mentees,
>
> I am looking for reviews for my package "webalizer"
>
> The previous maintainer Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) agreed that
> I take over the package, also as he his really busy and this package
> will be target
Dear mentors and mentees,
I am looking for reviews for my package "webalizer"
The previous maintainer Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) agreed that
I take over the package, also as he his really busy and this package
will be targeting experimental (due to the freeze) I'd like the package
to be rea
14 matches
Mail list logo
