Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-27 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 10:35 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > > Is it possible to upload new packages to Debian at this point? Since > > it's freeze time, does they go to experimental? > > Yes, it is possible to upload them, but they won't get into Lenny. > They will stay in unstable until Lenny is rele

Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-27 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2008/8/27 Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'll create the watch file (and the proper changelog entry) along with > the first non-snapshot release :) > > If there nothing else to fix at first glance, I'll roll out the > upstream release within the next few days. Thanks, if I find something

Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-27 Thread Sylvain Beucler
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 01:00:20AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > 2008/8/27 Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi Miry, > > > > You may want to check the latest snapshot at: > > http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/freedink-1.08.20080826.tar.gz > > http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/debian/freedi

Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-26 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2008/8/27 Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Miry, > > You may want to check the latest snapshot at: > http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/freedink-1.08.20080826.tar.gz > http://www.freedink.org/snapshots/debian/freedink_1.08.20080826-1.dsc > > I recently got help with x86_64 and the game was

Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-26 Thread Sylvain Beucler
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:13:48PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > 2008/8/23 Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > > > I uploaded a new version: > > > > * separate debian/ to the diff.gz > > > > * fix 'dfarc' build under amd64 > > > > * trim debhelper commented functions that do belong to th

Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-25 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi Brad, > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:52:24PM +0100, Tim Retout wrote: > > Brad Smith (of #492760 and debian-games team fame) has several patches > > to fix freedink on amd64, among other things. I got other reports of problems under x86_64. Could you send me your changes, even as-is? I will pr

Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-23 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2008/8/23 Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I uploaded a new version: > > * separate debian/ to the diff.gz > > * fix 'dfarc' build under amd64 > > * trim debhelper commented functions that do belong to the package > type > > * various fixes / doc clean-up > > Please let me know if th

Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-23 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi, I uploaded a new version: * separate debian/ to the diff.gz * fix 'dfarc' build under amd64 * trim debhelper commented functions that do belong to the package type * various fixes / doc clean-up Please let me know if there is any issue. Cheers! - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian

Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-22 Thread Sylvain Beucler
> It's perfectly valid for upstream to have their debian/ directory in > their own versioning system, but when generating the release tarball > it's much better to remove it from there and have it included in the > diff. That's what the diff is for, in any case. Sold. I wouldn't want people to spe

Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-21 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2008/8/20 Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> 1) Some of the tarballs include debian/ and their diffs are empty. In >> my opinion upstream tarballs should not include the debian/ directory. > > I thought about it, and I concluded when the maintainer is part of the > upstream team (or in this ca

Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-20 Thread Sylvain Beucler
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:52:24PM +0100, Tim Retout wrote: > On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 20:50 +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > > [Please keep me in Cc:, I didn't subscribe to the list] > > > 2) pdebuild on dfarc-2.99.20080819 fails (amd64): > > > > Nice catch. I have access to a amd64 box so I'll setup

Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-20 Thread Tim Retout
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 20:50 +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > [Please keep me in Cc:, I didn't subscribe to the list] > > 2) pdebuild on dfarc-2.99.20080819 fails (amd64): > > Nice catch. I have access to a amd64 box so I'll setup a pbuilder > there and try. Brad Smith (of #492760 and debian-games

Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-20 Thread Sylvain Beucler
[Please keep me in Cc:, I didn't subscribe to the list] > Sylvain, are you interested in packaging this game in your own or > would you consider joining the Debian Games Team and maintain it > collaboratively? At first glance I'd say I'm packaging the game on my own, but I'm open to alternative

Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-20 Thread Miriam Ruiz
My first thoughts on the packages: 1) Some of the tarballs include debian/ and their diffs are empty. In my opinion upstream tarballs should not include the debian/ directory. 2) pdebuild on dfarc-2.99.20080819 fails (amd64): x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/tmp/buildd/dfarc-2.99.2008

Re: RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-19 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2008/8/19 Sylvain Beucler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freedink". I'll try to have a look at it if I have some time. If anyone else is able to do it before I do, please go ahead. In any case, Sylvain, are you interested in packaging this game in

RFS: GNU FreeDink

2008-08-19 Thread Sylvain Beucler
Hi mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freedink". It's a port of the Dink Smallwood game engine, initially written for MS Windows by RTsoft, released as free software in 2003, and modified since then. RTsoft also agreed to release most of the game data under the zlib license, so