I added the linker version script and a symbols file in git. Would you
please upload the changes Mr. Mejia?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4db70ff1
Am 23.04.2011 09:50, schrieb George Danchev:
On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:03:32 Tobias Hansen wrote:
Am 23.04.2011 05:07, schrieb Paul Wise:
I would suggest adding a symbols file so that stuff using the new
symbols gets the new version and anything else gets the old version.
http://wiki.debian
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> On that wiki page it says:
> "If you find (on some arches) symbols that are exported which are not
> supposed to be public, you must not use symbols versioning at all."
That must be outdated, since the dpkg-gensymbols manual page has an
"op
On Saturday 23 April 2011 10:03:32 Tobias Hansen wrote:
> Am 23.04.2011 05:07, schrieb Paul Wise:
> > I would suggest adding a symbols file so that stuff using the new
> > symbols gets the new version and anything else gets the old version.
> >
> > http://wiki.debian.org/UsingSymbolsFiles
>
> On
Am 23.04.2011 05:07, schrieb Paul Wise:
I would suggest adding a symbols file so that stuff using the new
symbols gets the new version and anything else gets the old version.
http://wiki.debian.org/UsingSymbolsFiles
On that wiki page it says:
"If you find (on some arches) symbols that are expo
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> first of all, thanks for uploading the package. :) I saw that you removed
> the shlibs file. alure 1.1 introduced new symbols and so there must be a way
> for other packages to depend on alure 1.1, right? SLUDGE for example uses
> symbols in
Hi,
first of all, thanks for uploading the package. :) I saw that you
removed the shlibs file. alure 1.1 introduced new symbols and so there
must be a way for other packages to depend on alure 1.1, right? SLUDGE
for example uses symbols introduced in alure 1.1.
Regards,
Tobias Hansen
--
To
I changed the name of the dev package back to libalure-dev.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dadc96b.2010...@gmx.de
Am 15.04.2011 10:15, schrieb Paul Wise:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tobias Hansen
wrote:
Here's what you said:
(08:04:51) pabs: BigMc: since alure is a library, I suggest that you read
libpkg-guide to get familiar with packaging libraries
(08:05:23) pabs: libpkg-guide does recommend
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tobias Hansen
wrote:
> Here's what you said:
>
> (08:04:51) pabs: BigMc: since alure is a library, I suggest that you read
> libpkg-guide to get familiar with packaging libraries
> (08:05:23) pabs: libpkg-guide does recommend libfoo1-dev instead of
> libfoo-dev, w
Am 15.04.2011 02:10, schrieb Paul Wise:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Tobias Hansen
wrote:
Paul Wise suggested it, referencing the Debian Library Packaging guide. He
also said it's no problem because no program in Debian is using alure yet.
I thought I said that libpkg-guide was
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Tobias Hansen
wrote:
> Paul Wise suggested it, referencing the Debian Library Packaging guide. He
> also said it's no problem because no program in Debian is using alure yet.
I thought I said that libpkg-guide was wrong about library dev package names.
My commen
Am 14.04.2011 22:14, schrieb Andres Mejia:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
Am 13.04.2011 00:23, schrieb Andres Mejia:
Yes, same terms as upstream source.
Ok, done.
Ok. Took a quick look at changes to the packaging.
Why did you rename the develo
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> Am 13.04.2011 00:23, schrieb Andres Mejia:
>>
>> Yes, same terms as upstream source.
>>
> Ok, done.
Ok. Took a quick look at changes to the packaging.
Why did you rename the development package? Did you intend to maintain
more than one vers
Am 13.04.2011 00:23, schrieb Andres Mejia:
Yes, same terms as upstream source.
Ok, done.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4da53587.2090...@gmx.de
On Apr 12, 2011 2:21 PM, "Tobias Hansen" wrote:
>
> Am 12.04.2011 04:45, schrieb Andres Mejia:
>
>>
>> I'll take a look at this soon.
>>
> One thing I could add is copyright information for the Debian packaging.
Are you ok with GPL-3+ or do you suggest something else?
Yes, same terms as upstream
Am 12.04.2011 04:45, schrieb Andres Mejia:
I'll take a look at this soon.
One thing I could add is copyright information for the Debian packaging.
Are you ok with GPL-3+ or do you suggest something else?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
On Apr 11, 2011 5:54 PM, "Tobias Hansen" wrote:
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-1
> of my package "alure".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> alure-doc - AL Utilities REtooled (documentation)
> libalure1 - AL Utilities REtooled (shared library)
> liba
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-1
of my package "alure".
It builds these binary packages:
alure-doc - AL Utilities REtooled (documentation)
libalure1 - AL Utilities REtooled (shared library)
libalure1-dbg - AL Utilities REtooled (debugging symbols)
libalure1-de
19 matches
Mail list logo
