Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "anox".
anoX aims to provide a simple and powerful way to run an application,
mainly games, in another X server. The goal is to bypass bugs such as
wine's windows disappearing when using Comp
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 08:36:18AM +0100, Sébastien Bertrand wrote:
> > From the UNIX point of view, they are not.
>
> It seems that xinit behave this way, the following commands do not
> give the same result :
> xinit tremulous -- :1
> xinit tremulous --quiet -- :1
> xinit "tremulous --quiet" --
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 11:30:38AM +0100, Sébastien Bertrand wrote:
> > calling
> >
> > foo "bar x"
> >
> > is not the same as calling
> >
> > foo bar x.
>
> >From the point of view of anoX, these two commands are the same.
From the UNIX point of view, they are not.
--
Andrea Bolognani
Resi
Le 9 déc. 2011 10:27, "Ansgar Burchardt" a écrit :
>
> Sébastien Bertrand writes:
> >> - It probably does not handle whitespace in command names or
> >> directories.
> >
> > It handles complex command without problem.
>
> How? anonx does
>
> app = ' '.join(sys.argv[1:]) # Pick all arguments
Sébastien Bertrand writes:
>> - It probably does not handle whitespace in command names or
>> directories.
>
> It handles complex command without problem.
How? anonx does
app = ' '.join(sys.argv[1:]) # Pick all arguments,
but calling
foo "bar x"
is not the same as calling
foo bar
>>> - It's hardcoded to use "xinit -- :1 vt8".
>>
>> I do not understand why this is a problem, the eight terminal should
>> just be free (it's more a limitation than a bug).
> ---end quoted text---
>
> No, it's not always free. For example, it happens with me sometimes that
> X would crash for
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:50:53PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Sebastien Bertrand wrote:
>
> >> It's hardcoded to use "xinit -- :1 vt8".
> >
> > I do not understand why this is a problem, the eight terminal should
> > just be free (it's more a limitation than a bug).
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Sébastien Bertrand wrote:
>> - It's hardcoded to use "xinit -- :1 vt8".
>
> I do not understand why this is a problem, the eight terminal should
> just be free (it's more a limitation than a bug).
You can't assume that the user has not setup X server :1 on vt8 on
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:39:56AM +0100, Sébastien Bertrand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your interest.
>
> > - It's hardcoded to use "xinit -- :1 vt8".
>
> I do not understand why this is a problem, the eight terminal should
> just be free (it's more a limitation than a bug).
---end quoted
Dear mentors,
I've uploaded a new version of my package "anox", and I am looking for
a sponsor.
* Package name: anox
Version : 2.1-1
Upstream Author : Sébastien Bertrand
* URL : https://launchpad.net/anox
* License : GPL-3+
Section : x11
It bu
Hi,
Thank you for your interest.
> - It's hardcoded to use "xinit -- :1 vt8".
I do not understand why this is a problem, the eight terminal should
just be free (it's more a limitation than a bug).
> - It uses /tmp in an unsafe way (eg. predictable filename). Please use
> one of the methods
Hi,
Sébastien Bertrand writes:
>anox - run an application in another X server
While I don't plan to sponsor this, I found a few bugs after a short
look at the package:
- It's hardcoded to use "xinit -- :1 vt8".
- It uses /tmp in an unsafe way (eg. predictable filename). Please use
on
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "anox".
* Package name: anox
Version : 2.0-1
Upstream Author : Sébastien Bertrand
* URL : https://launchpad.net/anox
* License : GPL-3+
Section : x11
It builds those binary packages:
a
13 matches
Mail list logo
