Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwm":
* Package name : dwm
Version : 6.4-1
* URL : https://dwm.suckless.org/
* License : Expat
Section : x11
The source builds the followi
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2022 00:37:37 +0200
with message-id <5569edf6-d623-c11e-ea9a-043564bf3...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: dwm/6.4-0.1 [NMU] -- dynamic window manager
has caused the Debian Bug report #1021744,
regarding RFS: dwm/6.4-0.1 [NMU] -- dynamic window manager
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwm":
* Package name : dwm
Version : 6.4-0.1
* URL : https://dwm.suckless.org/
* License : Expat
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/hle/dwm
Your message dated Tue, 8 Feb 2022 18:44:05 +0100
with message-id <176fa1d6-08ff-ca3c-3c47-7fda2dc9d...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: dwm/6.3-0.2 [NMU] -- dynamic window manager
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005183,
regarding RFS: dwm/6.3-0.2 [NMU] -- dynamic window manager
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2022 14:09:01 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: dwm/6.3-0.1 [NMU] -- dynamic window manager
has caused the Debian Bug report #1003849,
regarding RFS: dwm/6.3-0.1 [NMU] -- dynamic window manager
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 12 Dec 2021 12:04:24 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: dwm/6.2-1 [NMU] -- dynamic window manager
has caused the Debian Bug report #1001530,
regarding RFS: dwm/6.2-0.1 [NMU] -- dynamic window manager
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 16:20:31 + Matteo Bini wrote:
dwm (6.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
The Debian revision for this NMU has to be -0.1 instead of -1.
The first changelog entry in an NMU has to be "Non-maintainer upload".
Please untag moreinfo when you have provide
Your message dated Sat, 11 Dec 2021 12:52:16 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: dwm/6.2-1 [ITA] -- dynamic window manager
has caused the Debian Bug report #1001507,
regarding RFS: dwm/6.2-1 [ITA] -- dynamic window manager
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
❦ 11 December 2021 10:43 GMT, Matteo Bini:
>* New maintainer
Is there some agreement with the original maintainer?
>* New upstream release.
You can close #978687 and #945281.
--
Debian package sponsoring guidelines:
https://vincent.bernat.ch/en/debian-package-sponsoring
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:06 PM, David Kalnischkies
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:56, Kartik Mistry wrote:
>> 1. gcc warnings:
>>
>> CC dwm.c
>> dwm.c:882:1: warning: ‘focusmon’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> [… a few more of those … ]
>>
>> Send this to upstream, if you haven't
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:56, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> 1. gcc warnings:
>
> CC dwm.c
> dwm.c:882:1: warning: ‘focusmon’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
[… a few more of those … ]
>
> Send this to upstream, if you haven't.
He is building two flavors, one without (a lot of) keybindings, so
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> Hello Mentors,
>
> I'm still looking for a sponsor. I've rebuilt the source with a patch
> provided by David and also added a dpkg-buildflags patch. Source is
> available at
> http://silpa.org.in/~vasudev/dwm/dwm_5.9-1.dsc
> I'm still no
Hello Mentors,
I'm still looking for a sponsor. I've rebuilt the source with a patch
provided by David and also added a dpkg-buildflags patch. Source is
available at
http://silpa.org.in/~vasudev/dwm/dwm_5.9-1.dsc
I'm still not able to upload to mentors so I've kept the source in my vps.
Hope
On 15:04 Sun 20 Nov , David Kalnischkies wrote:
> I am not a possible sponsor (no-D{D,M} sorry) and i haven't
> even reviewed your package closely, but i am relatively sure
> your package doesn't honor buildflags ala CFLAGS correctly.
> See dpkg-buildflags manpage, bits from dpkg [0] and some
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:15, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> We can provide different alternative dwm package with different
> config.h file there has been discussion on this [1] [2]. But I think
> after this I think first maintainer Orphaned this package.
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepor
Hello mentors,
I'm still looking for a sponsor for uploading my adapted package dwm.
Best Regards
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Vasudev Kamath
wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for package dwm. This package was orphaned
> by its previous maintainer. This upload will close
Hello Michael,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Hm. So I become curious and looked into its homepage --
> http://dwm.suckless.org/ . And there, there's one interesting note:
>
> Because dwm is customized through editing its source code, it’s
> pointless to make binary
On 10.11.2011 20:52, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for package dwm. This package was orphaned
> by its previous maintainer. This upload will close #647088.
Hm. So I become curious and looked into its homepage --
http://dwm.suckless.org/ . And there, there's
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for package dwm. This package was orphaned
by its previous maintainer. This upload will close #647088.
The package can be accessed using
dget -X http://silpa.org.in/~vasudev/dwm/dwm_5.9-1.dsc
I was trying to upload to mentors from past one week with no luc
2011/9/1 Etienne Millon
> * Jeremy Allard [110831 23:04]:
> > And just for the curiosity, what you mean by left dh_make template?
> > If the package doesn't need for exemple a post-install script,
> > should-I delete it or (that's what I tought) I should keep it there
> > but with nothing import
* Jeremy Allard [110831 23:04]:
> And just for the curiosity, what you mean by left dh_make template?
> If the package doesn't need for exemple a post-install script,
> should-I delete it or (that's what I tought) I should keep it there
> but with nothing important in? I read all the maintainer gu
2011/8/31 Etienne Millon
> * Jeremy Allard [110831 07:32]:
> > PS: I'm not really sure if it is te correct way to this. Please, correct
> me
> > if i'm wrong. I know that dwm is already present in main, but its oudated
> > and I have no news from the maintainer that i contacted by email a week
>
* Jeremy Allard [110831 07:32]:
> PS: I'm not really sure if it is te correct way to this. Please, correct me
> if i'm wrong. I know that dwm is already present in main, but its oudated
> and I have no news from the maintainer that i contacted by email a week ago.
>
> I would be thankfull if you
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:14:17AM -0400, Jeremy Allard wrote:
> PS: I'm not really sure if it is te correct way to this. Please, correct me
> if i'm wrong. I know that dwm is already present in main, but its oudated
> and I have no news from the maintainer that i contacted by email a week ago.
It
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwm".
* Package name: dwm
Version : 5.9-1
* URL : http://www.dwm.suckless.org
* License : MIT/X Consortium License
Section : x11
It builds those binary packages:
dwm - Dwm is a dynamic window
25 matches
Mail list logo
