Re: RFS: elgg

2009-05-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Brett Profitt brett.prof...@gmail.com wrote: I have to respectfully disagree that this is a sign of code quality. I can agree that allowing multiple sites is good practice, but it is a feature of the software, not an indication of code quality.  Many--if not

Re: RFS: elgg

2009-05-05 Thread Brett Profitt
The postrm makes me think that elgg can't do multiple sites on the same machine, is that the case? This is correct. Is the postrm OK for this situation? Ah, please work with upstream to make it a bit more flexible. Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but this seems to be a matter of having

Re: RFS: elgg

2009-05-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Brett Profitt brett.prof...@gmail.com wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package elgg. * Package name    : elgg  Version         : 1.5-1  Upstream Author : Curverider LLT i...@curveriderhq.com * URL             : http://www.elgg.org *

RFS: elgg

2009-05-01 Thread Brett Profitt
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package elgg. * Package name: elgg Version : 1.5-1 Upstream Author : Curverider LLT i...@curveriderhq.com * URL : http://www.elgg.org * License : GPL 2 (some components MIT, LGPL-2.1, and GPL-compatible custom