Hello Stephan!
Nice to hear some word from you. :)
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 03:35:06PM +0200, Stephan Beyer wrote:
> I wondered why Gunnar Monell changed 1.0b1 to 1.0.
> The only change from 1.0b1 to 1.0 is a correction in the manpage, funny.
> [...]
True, that's the only change. Well, due to the
Hi,
> I've packaged the most recent upstream version v1.0, but call it
> v1.0.0 in order to have a greater version number than the package
> already present in the Debian archive (v1.0b1).
I wondered why Gunnar Monell changed 1.0b1 to 1.0.
The only change from 1.0b1 to 1.0 is a correction in the
Dear mentors,
I going to adopt the fbgrab package[0] with the current maintainer's
consent[1], but I need your help as I'm not sufficiently advanced yet
in the NM queue[2] to do it completely on my own. In other words,
please somebody sponsor my packaging.
I've packaged the most recent upstream v
Hello Stephan!
Nice to hear some word from you. :)
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 03:35:06PM +0200, Stephan Beyer wrote:
> I wondered why Gunnar Monell changed 1.0b1 to 1.0.
> The only change from 1.0b1 to 1.0 is a correction in the manpage, funny.
> [...]
True, that's the only change. Well, due to the
Hi,
> I've packaged the most recent upstream version v1.0, but call it
> v1.0.0 in order to have a greater version number than the package
> already present in the Debian archive (v1.0b1).
I wondered why Gunnar Monell changed 1.0b1 to 1.0.
The only change from 1.0b1 to 1.0 is a correction in the
Dear mentors,
I going to adopt the fbgrab package[0] with the current maintainer's
consent[1], but I need your help as I'm not sufficiently advanced yet
in the NM queue[2] to do it completely on my own. In other words,
please somebody sponsor my packaging.
I've packaged the most recent upstream v
6 matches
Mail list logo
