* Jean Schurger [110106 15:40]:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "free42".
Looking at debian/changelog, that is not quite helpful:
| free42 (1.4.66-1) unstable; urgency=low
|
| * Upstream release
| * Closes: #606358
|
| -- Jean Schurger Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:38:31 -0500
The Closes
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "free42".
* Package name: free42
Version : 1.4.66-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Okken
* URL : http://thomasokken.com/free42/
* License : GPL2
Section : misc
It builds these binary packages:
free42
I've updated my package. Please have a look.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/free42/free42_1.4.66-1.dsc
Jean.
--
Jean Schurger
http://schurger.org
GPG: http://schurger.org/jean.asc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Le samedi 25 décembre 2010 à 00:48 +0900, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
> Hi,
> > >
> > > Oh, and I moved doc/free42/README.gtk to doc/free42/README as this is
> > > the general purpose readme file for this package.
>
> You meant gtk/README to usr/share/doc/free42/README while not installing
> README ?
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:35:14AM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> Le mardi 21 décembre 2010 à 11:25 +0100, Etienne Millon a écrit :
> > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:49:31AM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> > > I would like to simplify the debian/rules using (dh $@) but i think
> > > i don't understa
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:35:14AM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> Oh nice,
>
> Thanks for thoses explanations. Now i see much better what yo mean.
> (I've already seen package sources with install and dirs files, without
> really knowing why it was working).
You're welcome. I actually learnt fr
Le mardi 21 décembre 2010 à 11:25 +0100, Etienne Millon a écrit :
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:49:31AM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> > I would like to simplify the debian/rules using (dh $@) but i think
> > i don't understand clearly what is mean. Upstream sources does not
> > use autotools. Is (dh
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:49:31AM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> I would like to simplify the debian/rules using (dh $@) but i think
> i don't understand clearly what is mean. Upstream sources does not
> use autotools. Is (dh $@) still applicable ? I think i'm missing
> something.
Yes, it can be a
Le lundi 20 décembre 2010 à 13:07 +0100, Etienne Millon a écrit :
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:44:15AM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> > Hi, i've updated the packages, can you have a look ?
> >
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/free42/free42_1.4.66-1.dsc
> >
> > Jean.
>
> Hello,
>
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:44:15AM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> Hi, i've updated the packages, can you have a look ?
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/free42/free42_1.4.66-1.dsc
>
> Jean.
Hello,
It seems good to me. It builds in a clean chroot, and is lintian clean
upto -E. debi
Le vendredi 10 décembre 2010 à 20:02 +0100, Etienne Millon a écrit :
> Again, no need to CC me :)
>
> > Oh yes, i did not see the second patch (I'm not sure how it appear,
> > maybe when i was playing with quilt).
>
> According to the patch header, it has been created by dpkg-source. I
> can't re
Le vendredi 10 décembre 2010 à 20:02 +0100, Etienne Millon a écrit :
> Again, no need to CC me :)
>
> > Oh yes, i did not see the second patch (I'm not sure how it appear,
> > maybe when i was playing with quilt).
>
> According to the patch header, it has been created by dpkg-source. I
> can't re
Again, no need to CC me :)
> Oh yes, i did not see the second patch (I'm not sure how it appear,
> maybe when i was playing with quilt).
According to the patch header, it has been created by dpkg-source. I
can't remember the exact process, though.
> Well, there is only one option: -skin, I'll pu
Le vendredi 10 décembre 2010 à 10:53 +0100, Etienne Millon a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:07:30PM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> > Le jeudi 09 décembre 2010 à 08:59 +0100, Etienne Millon a écrit :
> > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 05:39:25PM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> > > > What's the 'good'
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:07:30PM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> Le jeudi 09 décembre 2010 à 08:59 +0100, Etienne Millon a écrit :
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 05:39:25PM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> > > What's the 'good' way to ask to review an update of a package like this
> > > one ? I should co
Le jeudi 09 décembre 2010 à 08:59 +0100, Etienne Millon a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 05:39:25PM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> > What's the 'good' way to ask to review an update of a package like this
> > one ? I should continue to dput it as replacement, and ask in that
> > thread ?
>
> "dp
Le jeudi 09 décembre 2010 à 08:59 +0100, Etienne Millon a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 05:39:25PM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> > What's the 'good' way to ask to review an update of a package like this
> > one ? I should continue to dput it as replacement, and ask in that
> > thread ?
>
> "dp
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 05:39:25PM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> What's the 'good' way to ask to review an update of a package like this
> one ? I should continue to dput it as replacement, and ask in that
> thread ?
"dput -f mentors" it will overwrite the previous package. You can
state that you
From: Jean Schurger
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: RFS: free42
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "free42".
* Package name: free42
Version : 1.4.66-1
Upstream Author : http://thomasokken.com/free42/
* URL : Thomas Okken
Le mercredi 08 décembre 2010 à 22:21 +0100, Etienne Millon a écrit :
> (no need to CC me, I am subscribed to the mailing-list)
>
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 04:04:09PM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> > Yes, i don't know what to do with that. I should not use the
> > 'unodcumented' because i've underst
(no need to CC me, I am subscribed to the mailing-list)
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 04:04:09PM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> Yes, i don't know what to do with that. I should not use the
> 'unodcumented' because i've understood that it is/will be deprecated.
>
> And i have no "manual" for that on the
Le mercredi 08 décembre 2010 à 21:56 +0100, Etienne Millon a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:30:36PM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> > I've updated my packages fixing the problems, can you have a
> > look ?
> >
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/free42/
> >
> > Jean.
>
> Hello J
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:30:36PM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> I've updated my packages fixing the problems, can you have a
> look ?
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/free42/
>
> Jean.
Hello Jean,
I could build your package. Here are a few remarks :
- lintian still complains
Le mercredi 08 décembre 2010 à 17:06 +0100, Benoît Knecht a écrit :
> Hi Jean,
>
> Jean Schurger wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "free42".
> >
> > * Package name: free42
> > Version : 1.4.66-1
> > Upstream Author : Thomas Okken
> > * URL : http://t
Hi Jean,
Jean Schurger wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "free42".
>
> * Package name: free42
> Version : 1.4.66-1
> Upstream Author : Thomas Okken
> * URL : http://thomasokken.com/free42/
> * License : GPL2
> Section : misc
>
> It b
Hello,
I am not a DD and thus can not sponsor you. However I had a look at
your package.
- It fails to build in a clean chroot. At the beginning of the build it
complains about missing headers :
touch symlinks
g++ -MMD -Wall -g -I/usr/X11R6/include -fno-exceptions -fno-
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "free42".
* Package name: free42
Version : 1.4.66-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Okken
* URL : http://thomasokken.com/free42/
* License : GPL2
Section : misc
It builds these binary packages:
free42
27 matches
Mail list logo
