Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

2008-12-18 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 18 December 2008 17:21:22 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Jonathan Wiltshire (18/12/2008): > > No problem by me :-) > > Uploaded as is. Thanks to both of you for taking care of that. I don't mind other sponsors uploading packages I've sponsored, in fact I welcome that provided the Debian

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

2008-12-18 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 04:21:22PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Uploaded as is. I'm assuming you know about lintian and possible > enhancements for this package (and that you already fixed that in > unstable), and that you chose the minimalist approach for this tpu > upload. :) Exactly, unstabl

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

2008-12-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Jonathan Wiltshire (18/12/2008): > No problem by me :-) Uploaded as is. I'm assuming you know about lintian and possible enhancements for this package (and that you already fixed that in unstable), and that you chose the minimalist approach for this tpu upload. :) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Des

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

2008-12-18 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:31:12PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I can do the upload if you like, unless you have a preference for > George's doing it. Ping on IRC is OK too. No problem by me :-) Thanks! -- Jonathan Wiltshire PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB8

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

2008-12-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Jonathan Wiltshire (18/12/2008): > Hi George Hello both of you, > Release have approved the debdiff and asked for the upload; it's on > mentors at [1] if you have a chance. Cheers :-) > > [1] > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gxemul/gxemul_0.4.6.3-1+lenny1.dsc I can do the uploa

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

2008-12-17 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi George On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 09:31:27PM +0200, George Danchev wrote: > > I will package seperately for testing-proposed-updates since lenny and > > sid are out of sync. > > I'll be offline next 48-72 hours (unexpected mountaineering ;) and I would be > thankful if anyone takes care of up

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

2008-11-29 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 02:32:22PM +, James Westby wrote: > Just to note that the above doesn't quite match the syntax required > to auto-close the bug, it needs a colon after the "LP". For those that > read perl the expression is In the changelog the syntax was correct and the bug has been cl

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

2008-11-29 Thread James Westby
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 21:31 +0200, George Danchev wrote: > On Monday 24 November 2008 17:27:16 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > Change: added patch 05_segfault_params.dpatch and included it in > > 00list. > > Closes: LP #301041 > > Helping Ubuntu folks is also very nice, and to be honest I was not aw

Re: RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

2008-11-24 Thread George Danchev
On Monday 24 November 2008 17:27:16 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Hello, > I am seeking a sponsor for a bugfix in gxemul, George Danchev kindly > sposored last time. This is a patch taken from upstream's CVS pending > it being included in a release, and fixes a segmentation fault if > gxemul is start

RFS: gxemul segfault bugfix

2008-11-24 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Dear mentors, I am seeking a sponsor for a bugfix in gxemul, George Danchev kindly sposored last time. This is a patch taken from upstream's CVS pending it being included in a release, and fixes a segmentation fault if gxemul is started with invalid parameters. Change: added patch 05_segfault_par