Daniel Baumann wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Can you explain why not automake (= 1.9) ?
because upstream has used automake 1.9. i'm no automake guru, if you are
sure that automake 1.10 is compatible with 1.9, then just use the newer
one. i'm normally to lazy to even check this, hence i
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
maybe do you want Marvin to finish it? It's not much left, only the
build-depends to automake1.9.
Okay!! I've re-uploaded it but haven't been able to check it.
i said automake1.9, not automake (= 1.9).
Can you explain why not automake (=
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Can you explain why not automake (= 1.9) ?
because upstream has used automake 1.9. i'm no automake guru, if you are
sure that automake 1.10 is compatible with 1.9, then just use the newer
one. i'm normally to lazy to even check this, hence i go with upstream
for the
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Doesn't it look like the machine, on which you tried to build the package,
doesn't have the necessary tools ?
of course it is 'my machine' which fails, but it's your job to take
care, that everything needed for compiliation (except essential
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 17:24, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Doesn't it look like the machine, on which you tried to build the
package, doesn't have the necessary tools ?
of course it is 'my machine' which fails, but it's your job to take
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
I need to setup a VM (UML) which I'll use to test the packages before
uploading. I'm having some configuration issues (security related) which are
important before I start using it and I've not looked more into it.
why not use a chroot? it's much easier and faster
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 18:20, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
I need to setup a VM (UML) which I'll use to test the packages before
uploading. I'm having some configuration issues (security related) which
are important before I start using it and I've not looked more into
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
maybe do you want Marvin to finish it? It's not much left, only the
build-depends to automake1.9.
Okay!! I've re-uploaded it but haven't been able to check it.
i said automake1.9, not automake (= 1.9).
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562
Doesn't it look like the machine, on which you tried to build the package,
doesn't have the necessary tools ?
But, during build if the tools weren't present, the package should complain.
Right ?
Ritesh
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Hope this time something doesn't break.
Daniel Baumann wrote:
* your package does not build, it is missing some of the kde build
depenendcies.
This is what confused me the most. If I follow the tricks mentioned in the
package build docs, it gives me a huge list of packages which I should add as
Build-Depends. I don't think adding
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Doesn't it look like the machine, on which you tried to build the package,
doesn't have the necessary tools ?
of course it is 'my machine' which fails, but it's your job to take
care, that everything needed for compiliation (except essential
packages) is listed in the
Am Dienstag, den 14.11.2006, 16:28 +0530 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package knetstats.
Just one more minor issue. There is a formatting bug in the manpge. The
whole phrase knetstats is a network activity status program that sits
in KDE's is
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Hope this time something doesn't break. :-)
well, the package is good now, except that it doesn't build:
[...]
# Add here commands to compile the package.
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user/knetstats-1.6.1'
cd . /bin/sh
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
* not required dh_* calls
I don't know which dh_ call you're pointing to. I've not changed any of those
calls. And I don't see any commented dh_ call there.
you don't install any examples, and you don't ship shared libraries,
hence those dh_* calls are useless.
btw,
Daniel Baumann wrote:
you don't install any examples, and you don't ship shared libraries,
hence those dh_* calls are useless.
Done
btw, you should also close the ITP through the changelog. then, the
package is good.
Closed.
Hope this time something doesn't break. :-)
Thanks,
Ritesh
--
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Baumann wrote:
but now, you've added additional stuff which you have successfully
removed previously:
* useless commented docbook-to-man call in rules
Okay!! Fixed.
* not required dh_* calls
I don't know which dh_ call you're pointing to. I've not changed any of those
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Daniel,
Thanks for all your points. I've re-uploaded it and now there are no lintian
warnings also. :-)
Everything well, except the following two regressions:
* changelog has got an empty line at the end again
* you removed $(MAKE)
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Daniel,
Thanks for all your points. I've re-uploaded it and now there are no lintian
warnings also. :-)
Everything well, except the following two regressions:
* changelog has got an empty line at the end again
FIXED
*
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Daniel,
Thanks for all your points. I've re-uploaded it and now there are no lintian
warnings also. :-)
Everything well, except the following two regressions:
* changelog has got an empty line at the end again
FIXED
*
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Daniel,
Thanks for all your points. I've re-uploaded it and now there are no lintian
warnings also. :-)
Everything well, except the following two regressions:
* changelog has got an empty line at
Daniel,
Thanks for all your points. I've re-uploaded it and now there are no lintian
warnings also. :-)
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
I've re-uploaded the package. Please have a look at it.
* you should not bump the revision, -1 was not uploaded to debian.
I've
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Daniel,
Thanks for all your points. I've re-uploaded it and now there are no lintian
warnings also. :-)
Everything well, except the following two regressions:
* changelog has got an empty line at the end again
* you removed $(MAKE) from build, i recommend you
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
I'll try fixing those problems and re-upload.
Any news, or are you no longer interested?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
On Friday 08 December 2006 13:56, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
I'll try fixing those problems and re-upload.
Any news, or are you no longer interested?
I'm really sorry for the delay. Since this is my first package, for the points
you'd mentioned, I need to do some
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
I'm really sorry for the delay. Since this is my first package, for the
points
you'd mentioned, I need to do some reading. But I've been very busy. :-(
no problem, it was just unknown if you need more time or something
different. however, take your time.
--
Daniel Baumann wrote:
if you fix above things, i'm happy to sponsor the package.
did you fix the package already?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Daniel Baumann wrote:
if you fix above things, i'm happy to sponsor the package.
did you fix the package already?
I didn't receive your earlier message for some reason. Sorry.
I did check my mailbox (along with the spam folder) but couldn't find the email.
Thanks
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
I didn't receive your earlier message for some reason. Sorry.
I did check my mailbox (along with the spam folder) but couldn't find the
email.
I didn't sent it to you personally, but to the mailinglist (which you
oviously should check when asking for sponsoring
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
your package is a native package, don't do this. additionally, please
fix the following things:
* remove the useless empty line at the end of changelog.
* this is ugly (in README.Debian):
---snipp---
--
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package knetstats.
* Package name: knetstats
Version : 1.6.1-1
Upstream Author : Hugo Parente Lima
* URL : http://knetstats.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Section : kde
It builds these binary
30 matches
Mail list logo
