Re: RFS: kopete-otr 0.7-1

Hi, On Friday 16 November 2007, Stefan Potyra wrote: > Hi, > > Am Freitag 16 November 2007 21:33:55 schrieb Paul Wise: > [..] > > > > > > There are a couple of "using uninitialised variable" and other > > > > warnings from gcc 4.2, please investigate them and send patches > > > > upstream. > > >

Re: RFS: kopete-otr 0.7-1

Hi, Am Freitag 16 November 2007 21:33:55 schrieb Paul Wise: [..] > > > > There are a couple of "using uninitialised variable" and other > > > warnings from gcc 4.2, please investigate them and send patches > > > upstream. > > > > I have checked the code but is a developer choise. :) > > Unless the

Re: RFS: kopete-otr 0.7-1

On Nov 16, 2007 7:45 PM, Francesco Cecconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hmm, I'm not sure about those lintian overrides, perhaps the library > > should be either made into a private library or split out into a > > separate package? > > the package is very small, and the libraries not important f

Re: RFS: kopete-otr 0.7-1

Hi Paul, On Friday 16 November 2007, Paul Wise wrote: > On Nov 13, 2007 10:09 PM, Francesco Cecconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kopete-otr". > > A review of your package: > > Any reason you use automake1.9 instead of the default version of > autom

Re: RFS: kopete-otr 0.7-1

On Nov 13, 2007 10:09 PM, Francesco Cecconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kopete-otr". A review of your package: Any reason you use automake1.9 instead of the default version of automake (1.10)? extra blank lines at the end of debian/control debian/watc

RFS: kopete-otr 0.7-1

Dear DD, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kopete-otr". * Package name : kopete-otr Version : 0.7-1 * URL : http://kopete-otr.follefuder.org/ * License : GPL Section : net It builds these binary packages: ko