Re: RFS: libmesh

2007-06-03 Thread Ondrej Certik
If the upstream tarball contains non-free sources, you'll have to repackage it. See section 6.7.8.2 of the developers' reference[1]. Naturally, it must also /work/ without the parts you've removed. If possible and useful, you may want to consider moving the parts that have been removed to packages

Re: RFS: libmesh

2007-06-03 Thread Bryan Donlan
On 6/1/07, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, libmesh is a good library. Only their build system and the way to compile your own programs is nonstandard that's why I decided to create a debian package for it. Now it can be used very easily as any other C++ library. If the upstream t

Re: RFS: libmesh

2007-06-01 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Alan, thanks for looking at that. Here is the new dsc: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libmesh/libmesh_0.6.0~rc2.dfsg-1.dsc The package is now lintian&linda clean, builds fine in pbuilder. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=426734 seems to have appeared now. Fi

Re: RFS: libmesh

2007-05-31 Thread Alan Woodland
Ondrej Certik wrote: * debian/changelog contains Closes: #, because although I filled the ITP bug, I still didn't receive the email with the bug number * although mentors.debian.net says no lintian errors, their scripts don't work, because there are in fact the following two errors: wrong-bu

RFS: libmesh

2007-05-30 Thread Ondrej Certik
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libmesh". * Package name: libmesh Version : 0.6.0~rc2.dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Benjamin S. Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> et. al. * URL : http://libmesh.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL Section : libs