On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 12:52:46PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
What has upstream's response? If you really want the package in Debian but
upstream doesn't want to integrate your patches without a good reason you
could anyway package it, drop a few lines in debian/README.Debian and look
for
I am dropping my intended maintainership for the `lockrun` package.
Details can be found here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=461915
You are more than welcome to convert this back from an RFP and claim ownership.
The source code is available here:
Noah Slater wrote:
I am dropping my intended maintainership for the `lockrun` package.
Details can be found here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=461915
What has upstream's response? If you really want the package in Debian but
upstream doesn't want to integrate your
On Wednesday 18 June 2008, Noah Slater wrote:
--cut--
Hello, and sorry for the late reply,
Seems like cdbs magic doesn't cope with that, but you can still save the
day: clean:: unpatch
common-install-prehook-impl:: patch
This is a bug in CDBS, I have reported it as #486848:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 06:14:41PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
A possible problem could arise when users of your source package decide to
exemine the source code and call fakeroot debian/rules patch, but there is
still modification left (no matter how innocent it is) to be done against the
C
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 09:31:00PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
Sure, the CDBS magic is fine, although being magic behind the scene could be
dangerous sometimes. It is Debian Policy #4.9 which says: The binary target
must be all that is necessary for the user to build the binary package(s)
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 07:04:30PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
debian/copyright:
Debianized-By: Noah Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debianized-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 22:58:05 +
You should read the wiki page again now, those have a different name now.
Heh, I was the one who made that
On Thursday 29 May 2008, Noah Slater wrote:
Hello,
Thank you all for the suggestions/comments, etc.
Hello,
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:43:19AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
I'd rather reply with few questions ;-) -- it seems that the
command-option.patch is not applied before building
Noah Slater wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 07:04:30PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
debian/copyright:
By the way, where did you get this line from?
Copyright: Copyright 2008, Stephen J. Friedl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't see any statement in the .c file that it is copyrighted. And as the
file
Hello,
Thank you all for the suggestions/comments, etc.
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:43:19AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
I'd rather reply with few questions ;-) -- it seems that the
command-option.patch is not applied before building stage causing your
help2man call to fail, since the binary
Hi there,
Noah Slater wrote:
...
Would you mind taking another look at this package following these
changes?
debian/copyright:
Debianized-By: Noah Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debianized-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 22:58:05 +
You should read the wiki page again now, those have a different name
On Saturday 24 May 2008, Noah Slater wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:46:59PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
Done, and re-uploaded to mentors.d.o
Hey, is there any chance someone could take another look at this please?
Hey Noah,
I'd rather reply with few questions ;-) -- it seems that the
Neil Williams wrote:
Just re-reading what you said:
...
CC=cc
endif
That will cause troubles when using CC=gcc-4.3 dpkg-buildpackage (for
example in i386, where 4.3 is not the default gcc).
Something like CC=$(CC) should be used (the intention is to preserve the
original $(CC), but of
Noah Slater wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 10:54:56AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Please upload your key to a public keyserver.
Very strange, my key has been uploaded for months.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ $ gpg --recv-key 0x8FBFCFBF
gpg: requesting key 8FBFCFBF from hkp server
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 16:37 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Neil Williams wrote:
Just re-reading what you said:
ifneq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE))
CC=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)-gcc
else
CC=cc
endif
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) lockrun.c -o lockrun
...
CC=cc
endif
That will cause
Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 16:37 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
$(OURCC) $(CFLAGS) lockrun.c -o lockrun
OUR is the wrong prefix, CROSSCC is probably better.
The thing is that it is not always used for cross compiling, so I don't
think CROSSCC is the best name either.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:46:59PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
Done, and re-uploaded to mentors.d.o
Hey, is there any chance someone could take another look at this please?
Many thanks,
--
Noah Slater - Bytesexual http://bytesexual.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 10:54:56AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Please upload your key to a public keyserver.
Very strange, my key has been uploaded for months.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ $ gpg --recv-key 0x8FBFCFBF
gpg: requesting key 8FBFCFBF from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net
gpg: key 61D50B88:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my (very small) package lockrun.
* Package name: lockrun
Version : 1-1
Upstream Author : Stephen J. Friedl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.unixwiz.net/tools/lockrun.html
* License : Public domain
Language:
Noah Slater wrote:
...
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lockrun/lockrun_1-1.dsc
$ dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lockrun/lockrun_1-1.dsc
dget: retrieving
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lockrun/lockrun_1-1.dsc
% Total% Received % Xferd
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 10:54 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
debian/rules:
gcc lockrun.c -o lockrun
Please don't do that, at least call gcc with CFLAGS:
gcc $(CFLAGS) lockrun.c -o lockrun
Use the proper DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE variable too so that the package can be
cross-built (and use the cc
21 matches
Mail list logo
