Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-5
of my package metacam.
It builds these binary packages:
metacam- extract EXIF information from digital camera files
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 455621
The package can be found
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-4
of my package metacam.
It builds these binary packages:
metacam- extract EXIF information from digital camera files
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 279342, 425241
The package can
Hi,
Kevin Coyner escribió:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 08:43:13PM -0400, Juan Angulo Moreno wrote..
How was Bug #279342 fixed? It is not apparent from the
changelog, and running interdiff between the diff files doesn't
show anything new in that respect.
I closed bug because when
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:41:27PM -0400, Juan Angulo Moreno wrote..
Software does not have another mirror where can download the
source code. Could eliminate the file debian/watch so that it
looks for updates of software?
I'm pretty sure that there needs to be an upstream somewhere,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-4
of my package metacam.
It builds these binary packages:
metacam- extract EXIF information from digital camera files
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 01:40:51PM -0400, Juan Angulo Moreno wrote..
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-4 of my package
metacam.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/metacam/metacam_1.2-4.dsc
A few comments:
debian/compat: update to 5
debian/control:
indent
Hi Kevin.
Kevin Coyner escribió:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 01:40:51PM -0400, Juan Angulo Moreno wrote..
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-4 of my package
metacam.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/metacam/metacam_1.2-4.dsc
Thanks,
A few comments:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 08:43:13PM -0400, Juan Angulo Moreno wrote..
How was Bug #279342 fixed? It is not apparent from the
changelog, and running interdiff between the diff files doesn't
show anything new in that respect.
I closed bug because when metacam was updated of version
8 matches
Mail list logo
