Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-05-01 Thread Emilien Klein
Julien 2011/5/1 Julien Valroff : > Uploaded - you should now have received a confirmation the package should go > through the NEW queue. I indeed got a few messages. Thank you very much for the upload. I'll keep monitoring to learn about the upload process! Thank you very much for your review wo

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-05-01 Thread Julien Valroff
Le dimanche 01 mai 2011 à 19:55:21 (+0200 CEST), Emilien Klein a écrit : > Both done. New version uploaded, please check. Uploaded - you should now have received a confirmation the package should go through the NEW queue. Cheers, Julien -- .''`. Julien Valroff ~ ~ : :' : Debian Dev

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-05-01 Thread Emilien Klein
Julien, 2011/5/1 Julien Valroff : > Le dimanche 01 mai 2011 à 15:12:48 (+0200 CEST), Emilien Klein a écrit : > I don't get this empty directory when removing the complete dh_install > override... > > Looking at the bug you reported against python-distutils-extra [0], I have > checked the code and

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-05-01 Thread Julien Valroff
Hi Emilien, Le dimanche 01 mai 2011 à 15:12:48 (+0200 CEST), Emilien Klein a écrit : > > As for the packaging itself, I would still clean rules file by removing > > unneeded `find…' call and the override_dh_auto_build > > I removed override_dh_auto_build. However, I believe the 'find…' is > neede

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-05-01 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi Julien, 2011/5/1 Julien Valroff : >> Could one of you please review the latest changes in my package? > > I reviewed your package yesterday and was testing it. Thanks! > As for the packaging itself, I would still clean rules file by removing > unneeded `find…' call and the override_dh_auto_bu

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-30 Thread Julien Valroff
Hi Emilien, Le samedi 30 avril 2011 à 22:56:12 (+0200 CEST), Emilien Klein a écrit : > Julien, Paul, Niels, Stefano, and the other mentors, > > Could one of you please review the latest changes in my package? I reviewed your package yesterday and was testing it. As for the packaging itself, I w

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-30 Thread Emilien Klein
Julien, Paul, Niels, Stefano, and the other mentors, Could one of you please review the latest changes in my package? Thanks, +Emilien P.S.: Please CC me since I'm not subscribed to the mentors list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "un

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-19 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi Stefano, 2011/4/19 Stefano Rivera : > Drop the unnecessary preinst (it's a new package, not one migrating from > pycentral to pysupport). Done. > Drop the unecessary unexports from debian/rules. Are all the unexports unnecessary? I currently have those (set automatically by stdeb 0.5.1): #

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-18 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Emilien (2011.04.19_00:41:32_+0200) > I have also taken steps to use dh_python2, using information found at > [1] and [2]. Please confirm that the package is being built as > intended. Looks reasonable. Drop the unnecessary preinst (it's a new package, not one migrating from pycentral to pysup

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-18 Thread Emilien Klein
Julien, I have found a very useful blog post by Raphaël Hertzog [0] that does exactly what I was trying to do, i.e. ignoring auto-updated files. This is done by passing the --extend-diff-ignore option to dpkg-source in the debian/source/options file. I have thus removed my command from override_dh

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-17 Thread Emilien Klein
Julien, > This is the wrong approach: you cannot rely on the orig tarball being in ../ > - also what would happen in case you have various orig tarballs there? > > eg. I use pbuilder, hence my tarballs are in ~/debian/tarballs… > > Why not simply try and avoid i18n files to be updated or, even eas

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-16 Thread Julien Valroff
Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 à 22:27:29 (+0200 CEST), Emilien Klein a écrit : > Paul Gevers, Julien Valroff, [...] > Regarding the automatic patches created, i was able to trace its creation: > `python setup.py install` automatically rebuilds the i18n files. In > doing so, it updates the .pot translation

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-14 Thread Julien Valroff
Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 à 22:27:29 (+0200 CEST), Emilien Klein a écrit : > Paul Gevers, Julien Valroff, [...] > Can you please check my updated package [1]? Thanks! I'll have a look during the week-end. Cheers, Julien -- .''`. Julien Valroff ~ ~ : :' : Debian Developer & Free softwa

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-14 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-04-14 22:27, Emilien Klein wrote: > [...] > > Also, I have installed Squeeze in a VM. Since running the packaging in > Debian directly, Lintian is not complaining anymore about using a too > recent Standards-Version. With that, all 3 of Juli

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-14 Thread Emilien Klein
Paul Gevers, Julien Valroff, I've created the package both with debuild and pdebuild. The latter made me realize I needed more build dependencies (pkg-config, python-nautilus) that where used by the `python setup.py install` command. The package was building OK, but since those packages where not

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-13 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi > When running with pbuilder on my Ubuntu machine it uses the same > version of lintian, so I get the same warning message. I will thus > install Debian to use pbuilder from that. I also run with pbuilder (mind you, I build with pdebuild) but if the target in your changelog is unstable, "pbu

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-13 Thread Emilien Klein
Paul, 2011/4/13 Paul Gevers : >> I have used pbuilder, and it seems to me that all needed build >> dependencies are correctly addressed. > > < snip > > >> That's due to the Lintian version I have on my Ubuntu 10.04 >> workstation, which is not the most recent (2.3.4ubuntu2). What are the >> conseq

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-12 Thread Paul Gevers
> I have used pbuilder, and it seems to me that all needed build > dependencies are correctly addressed. < snip > > That's due to the Lintian version I have on my Ubuntu 10.04 > workstation, which is not the most recent (2.3.4ubuntu2). What are the > consequences of not running the latest version

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-12 Thread Emilien Klein
Forgot to add again that I'm not subscribed to the list, please CC me on any response. I will try to not forget to specify that on future messages... 2011/4/12 Emilien Klein : > Hi Julien, > > I have started the package over from scratch, using the resource you > mentioned in [0]. I have added som

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-12 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi Julien, I have started the package over from scratch, using the resource you mentioned in [0]. I have added some files I already had from my previous packaging intent (like for the manpage and the watch file). I have used pbuilder, and it seems to me that all needed build dependencies are corre

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-08 Thread Julien Valroff
Hi Emilien, Le samedi 09 avril 2011 à 00:05:35 (+0200 CEST), Emilien Klein a écrit : > Hi Julien, > > Thanks for your answer, which I just read (I am not subscribed to the > mentors mailing list) Then please, state it in your messages so that I (we) can CC you. > I will update the package accor

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-04-08 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi Julien, Thanks for your answer, which I just read (I am not subscribed to the mentors mailing list) I will update the package according to your comments. Question: do I need to continue replying to the list also, or should we continue this discussion off-list? Tthanks, +Emilien -- To UN

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-03-26 Thread Julien Valroff
Hi Emilien, Le dimanche 20 mars 2011 à 11:04:02 (+0100 CET), Emilien Klein a écrit : > Hi mentors, > > I'd appreciate if somebody could have a look at this package. > > Thanks! > +Emilien > > 2011/2/9 Emilien Klein : > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nauti

Re: RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-03-20 Thread Emilien Klein
Hi mentors, I'd appreciate if somebody could have a look at this package. Thanks! +Emilien 2011/2/9 Emilien Klein : > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-image-manipulator". > > * Package name    : nautilus-image-manipulator >  Version         : 0.2-1 >  Ups

RFS: nautilus-image-manipulator

2011-02-08 Thread Emilien Klein
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-image-manipulator". * Package name: nautilus-image-manipulator Version : 0.2-1 Upstream Author : Emilien Klein (me...) * URL : https://launchpad.net/nautilus-image-manipulator * License : GPL 3