Hi,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:03:24PM +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
I uploaded the package.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
oss-compat, which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 01:06 +0200 schrieb Stephen Kitt:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
oss-compat, which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
oss-compat, which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
makes
Hi Sven,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
oss-compat, which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
makes sense since
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:57:58PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Hi,
with so many replies, I guess I should write one more. :-/
I'm not really sure why Fuddl reset the maintainer field when uploading;
the usual practice is to set it to the Debian Games Team (as Stephen did)
and, if necessary,
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:57 +0300 schrieb Peter Pentchev:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
oss-compat,
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:48 +0200 schrieb Bruno Kleinert:
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:57 +0300 schrieb Peter Pentchev:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 at 15:39:34 +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
It seems as if sbuild exchanges the Maintainer field in the binary
package. If I schroot into my build environment and use
dpkg-buildpackage instead of sbuild the Maintainer field in the
resulting binary package remains unchanged.
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Simon McVittie:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 at 15:39:34 +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
It seems as if sbuild exchanges the Maintainer field in the binary
package. If I schroot into my build environment and use
dpkg-buildpackage instead of sbuild the
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 04:22:13PM +0200, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
What's the best practice to fix things up? Should I bump the debian
revision of the package and re-upload it? I don't want to be blamed for
hijacking packages by accident ;)
No hard feelings ;-)
It's a native package, so I
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package
oss-compat, which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this
makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are old
Linux games.)
It builds these binary packages:
oss-compat - Open
12 matches
Mail list logo
