On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 21:03 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
My fault, i just pasted the template suggested by the My packages area
at mentors.debian.net without checking it. As you can see at [1], the
system thinks that the package is lintian clean...
[1]
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 05:01:26PM +0200, Federico Gimenez Nieto wrote:
Ok, I've asked the former maintainer about the changes, he has sent me
this link [1] about packages wih similar license issues.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=332617
I don't see how it's related, or
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 18:25 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
If there is a new upstream version available there is (almost) no need
to upload an older one first. If it solves bugs, even better, and you
can consider your licensing issue as a bug of severity serious.
So, still being no DD I'd
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.4-3
of my package php-xml-util.
It builds these binary packages:
php-xml-util - a XML utility for php-pear
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 529694
The package can be found on
IANADD, but...
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 05:50:47PM +0200, Federico Gimenez Nieto wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.4-3
of my package php-xml-util.
It builds these binary packages:
php-xml-util - a XML utility for php-pear
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package appears to be lintian clean.
No, it's not.
W: php-xml-util source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is 3.8.2)
My fault, i just pasted the template suggested by the My packages area
at mentors.debian.net without checking it. As you can see at [1], the
system
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 08:02:16PM +0200, Federico Gimenez Nieto wrote:
The package appears to be lintian clean.
No, it's not.
W: php-xml-util source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is
3.8.2)
My fault, i just pasted the template suggested by the My packages
7 matches
Mail list logo
