RFS: plastex

2007-07-19 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
From: Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: plastex Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "plastex". * Package name: plastex Version : 0.8.1-1 Upstream Author : Kevin Smith <[EMAI

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-19 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
> lintian spits out warnings about -x flag on the py-files, as they all > has a shebang, also the setup.py generates a cgpdfpng that only will > work under OSX, but I don't know a good way to fix that. patch the source? For example by using dpatch. There're examples for that in every second pytho

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-19 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
On 7/20/07, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > lintian spits out warnings about -x flag on the py-files, as they all > has a shebang, also the setup.py generates a cgpdfpng that only will > work under OSX, but I don't know a good way to fix that. patch the source? For example by using d

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-19 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
Sorry, gmail fnucked it up for me :( -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-19 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
>> A few more comments: >> - you could create the manpage while building the package, that would >> make sure you don't forget to update it accidentally. > > The manpage is created at build time, by using xsltproc why is the result included in the diff then? >> - * Removed the CVS directories -

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread François Févotte
Hello, On 7/20/07, Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: lintian spits out warnings about -x flag on the py-files, as they all has a shebang, also the setup.py generates a cgpdfpng that only will work under OSX, but I don't know a good way to fix that. to remove unneeded shebang lines, I

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
How common is this? i.e. would it be time to implement something like dh_pystrip debhelper thingi? /Carl On 7/20/07, François Févotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, On 7/20/07, Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > lintian spits out warnings about -x flag on the py-files, as they al

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Carl Fürstenberg wrote: > How common is this? i.e. would it be time to implement something like > dh_pystrip debhelper thingi? imho you want to send a bugreport to upstream instead. Cheers, Bernd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
On 7/20/07, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > how do you mean by "provide a way to repackage the upstream tarball"? http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-origtargz I would need some help interpret that. 1. must contain detaile

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Carl Fürstenberg wrote: > On 7/20/07, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > how do you mean by "provide a way to repackage the upstream tarball"? >> >> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-origtargz >> > > I would need some help in

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
On 7/20/07, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Probably reading the New Maintainer's reference and the other documents linked on http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#maint-guide could be useful for you. Best regards, Bernd Zeimetz Hehe, have read that million of times :) I mostly

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
Have updated the package now, and I think it's only the licensing issue still in need of taking care about. See: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-plastex/ /Carl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-24 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 03:36:56PM +0200, François Févotte wrote: > Hello, > > On 7/20/07, Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> lintian spits out warnings about -x flag on the py-files, as they all >> has a shebang, also the setup.py generates a cgpdfpng that only will >> work under OSX,

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-24 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
On 7/24/07, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or sed -i -re '1{/^#!/d}' > > I note that sed -n -i is a dangerous combination.. How do you handle clean target then? /Carl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-24 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 11:01:06PM +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote: > On 7/24/07, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Or sed -i -re '1{/^#!/d}' > > > > I note that sed -n -i is a dangerous combination.. > > How do you handle clean target then? Do you mean how can you reverse the change to s

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-25 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
have uploaded a new package now, where I have been trying to get all the licenses correct. Hope they work fine. /Carl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-08-01 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
>> to remove unneeded shebang lines, I usually use a small perl script >> called at the end of debian/rules. I find this much more flexible than >> maintaining a set of patches. >> > Or sed -i -re '1{/^#!/d}' > You have to maintain a list of files you want to apply this to anyway (some f

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-08-01 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Carl Fürstenberg wrote: > have uploaded a new package now, where I have been trying to get all > the licenses correct. Hope they work fine. > no need for that, just ask POX or any other DD in #debian-python to sponsor it, they usually build it from the svn and use uscan - much faster and more e