On 2/18/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/debpkgs
As they are built using pdebuild, I guess this would be really all
right.
Ok, it had only a very small problem: it used DH_COMPAT=5, and the
debhelper dependecy said = 4, I bumped this to 5 and
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:57:31AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
On 2/18/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/debpkgs
As they are built using pdebuild, I guess this would be really all
right.
Ok, it had only a very small problem: it used
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 09:12:50AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
ASCII 14/5 is decimal 229, hex e5, octal 345, bits 11100101: meta-e
This character isn't/shouldn't be affected by dos2unix, which should
only have an effect on \r=0x0d immediately preceeding \n=0x0a.
You might just figure out
On 2/18/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have uploaded the new package, renamed as harvestman, to
http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/debpkgs/
Now, the bug I have filed (#352012) calls the package as
python-harvestman; what do I do about the bug report? Also, do the
mentors need
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 11:46:53AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
You can retitle the bug, although it's not terribly important, if you
have the spare time, do it.
No need to file another RFS, I'm looking at the package right now.
That can wait!
Well, I see some trouble: you didn't upload
On 2/18/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it is there! However, I have not generated the link:
http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/debpkgs/harvestman_1.4.6.orig.tar.gz
Well, I'm looking at it. I see that you decided to stay with the 2.3
version, but the description is not
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 12:34:40PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
Well, I'm looking at it. I see that you decided to stay with the 2.3
version, but the description is not updated. I mean, in your
debian/control file, you should remove the dummy part.
And something weird is happening...
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 21:52 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
And, there was a source indentation error in feedparser.py, which I
noticed while byte compiling. I have corrected that as well.
I haven't had time to look at this package yet. But, if it's using an
unmodified feedparser, please use the
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 12:47:47PM -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 21:52 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
And, there was a source indentation error in feedparser.py, which I
noticed while byte compiling. I have corrected that as well.
I haven't had time to look at this package
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 12:47:47PM -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 21:52 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
And, there was a source indentation error in feedparser.py, which I
noticed while byte compiling. I have corrected that as well.
I haven't had time to look at this package
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 12:57:16PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 03:42:41PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Public domain and the GPL are mutually exclusive. Please don't write
this in the debian package description. Also, no need to put the
licence in the description.
On 2/17/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, since the code is written in DOS mode, can I run dos2unix on the
code? Otherwise, python2.4 seems to give some warnings:
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/HarvestMan/connector.py:72:
DeprecationWarning: Non-ASCII character '\xe5' in file
On 2/15/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please send in your comments, so that I can improve it.
There's a small typo in the README.Debian file: you can also sue the
... it should be you can also use the ... :)
Also, it seems you've written quite a long manpage... It would be nice
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 01:52:00PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
On 2/15/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please send in your comments, so that I can improve it.
There's a small typo in the README.Debian file: you can also sue the
... it should be you can also use the ...
On 2/16/06, Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, is this a python module or a python program ? It looks
like a python program to me, and therefore it does not need to be
called python2.3-harvestman but rather harvestman -1.0 and
harvestman-1.1 or something like that. The
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 07:33 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
HarvestMan is the only public-domain, multithreaded web-crawler
program written in the Python language. HarvestMan is released under
the GNU General Public License.
Public domain and the GPL are mutually exclusive. Please don't write
On 17-Feb-2006, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 07:33 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
HarvestMan is the only public-domain, multithreaded web-crawler
program written in the Python language. HarvestMan is released
under the GNU General Public License.
Public domain and the GPL are
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 03:42:41PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Public domain and the GPL are mutually exclusive. Please don't write
this in the debian package description. Also, no need to put the
licence in the description. Also, the fact that it is written in
python is obvious from the
Dear Mentors,
I'd like you to see HarvestMan (http://harvestman.freezope.org) (ITP
bug #352012). I have made some updates to the package over the last week.
Description:
quote
HarvestMan can be used to download files from websites, according to a
number of user-specified rules. The latest version
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:08:13PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
[snip]
Sorry, it should have been RFS!
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
20 matches
Mail list logo
