Re: RFS: retext (updated package)

2011-08-06 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Jakub, On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 12:15:41AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Kilian Krause , 2011-08-05, 23:58: > >>>1.) You add python, python-qt4, python-markdown on top of > >>>${python:Depends} into the Depends line. This should not be > >>>required. Please check to make sure the automatic detec

Re: RFS: retext (updated package)

2011-08-05 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Kilian Krause , 2011-08-05, 23:58: 1.) You add python, python-qt4, python-markdown on top of ${python:Depends} into the Depends line. This should not be required. Please check to make sure the automatic detection works ok for you but try to use it to not add too many dependencies that aren't

Re: RFS: retext (updated package)

2011-08-05 Thread Kilian Krause
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:51:15PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Kilian Krause , 2011-08-05, 15:22: > >1.) You add python, python-qt4, python-markdown on top of > >${python:Depends} into the Depends line. This should not be > >required. Please check to make sure the automatic detection works > >ok

Re: RFS: retext (updated package)

2011-08-05 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Kilian Krause , 2011-08-05, 15:22: 1.) You add python, python-qt4, python-markdown on top of ${python:Depends} into the Depends line. This should not be required. Please check to make sure the automatic detection works ok for you but try to use it to not add too many dependencies that aren't

Re: RFS: retext (updated package)

2011-08-05 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Dmitry, On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 02:35:04PM +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.5-1 of my package "retext". > It's a bugfix release, but it fixes some important bugs (like "View > HTML code" action not working) > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/deb

Re: RFS: retext (another try)

2011-06-02 Thread Amaya
Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "retext". I'm happy to look at it, if no one else is already looking at it. Just ping me privately. -- .''`. #yeswecamp #spanishrevolution : :' : `. `' `-Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

RFS: retext (another try)

2011-06-01 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "retext". * Package name: retext Version : 1.1.0-2 Upstream Author : I (Dmitry Shachnev) * URL : http://retext.sourceforge.net/ * License : GNU GPL Section : editors It builds these binary packa

Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-17 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Fixed (retext 1.0.2-4). As a side-effect, debian.tar.gz now contains icons/* dirs. (I can remove them at each build, but I'll everytime forget to do it :) ). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de

Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-15 Thread Andrew O. Shadoura
Hello, On Sun, 15 May 2011 17:19:22 +0200 Jakub Wilk wrote: > >>rm -rf debian/icons > >You can use the debian/clean file. No need to add any overrides ;) > However, you can't remove directories via debian/clean, and I assume > that debian/icons is a directory. You can remove debian/icons

Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-15 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Andrew O. Shadoura , 2011-05-15, 17:54: override_dh_auto_clean: dh_auto_clean rm -rf debian/icons rm -f retext rm -f wpgen/wpgen Dmitry Shachnev You can use the debian/clean file. No need to add any overrides ;) However, you can't remove directories via debi

Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-15 Thread Andrew O. Shadoura
Hello, On Sat, 14 May 2011 14:05:01 +0400 Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > override_dh_auto_clean: > dh_auto_clean > rm -rf debian/icons > rm -f retext > rm -f wpgen/wpgen > > Dmitry Shachnev You can use the debian/clean file. No need to add any overrides ;) -- WBR, Andrew

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-14 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Done! override_dh_auto_clean: dh_auto_clean rm -rf debian/icons rm -f retext rm -f wpgen/wpgen Dmitry Shachnev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archi

Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-13 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Dear mentors, I updated my package "retext" and I am still looking for a sponsor. This version solves some packaging issues that I was pointed to. Also, this is new upstream release. * Package name: retext Version : 1.0.2 Upstream Author : me (Dmitry Shachnev) * URL :

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-13 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 08:07:12PM +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > You didn't understand me. Nope, *you* didn't understand me :) > dh_auto_clean is being called BEFORE the build process, but I need to > remove retext and wpgen/wpgen AFTER it. If you just copy the scripts, you can safely use "rm

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-13 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
You didn't understand me. dh_auto_clean is being called BEFORE the build process, but I need to remove retext and wpgen/wpgen AFTER it. I will try to solve this via adding a customized binary-indep and install sections. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-11 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 07:05:00PM +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hm... It seems that dh_auto_clean is called *before* the build process: > > > fakeroot debian/rules clean > dh_auto_clean > rm -rf debian/icons > mv retext retext.py > mv: could not stat «retext»: No such file or directory To sol

Re: Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-11 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hm... It seems that dh_auto_clean is called *before* the build process: fakeroot debian/rules clean dh_auto_clean rm -rf debian/icons mv retext retext.py mv: could not stat «retext»: No such file or directory Maybe I should use dh_something_else instead? (The same with dh_clean). BTW, ReText 1

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Sorry Dmitry, I'm not a DD, so I can't upload your package. Cheers, Fabrizio. Il giorno lun, 09/05/2011 alle 21.07 +0400, Dmitry Shachnev ha scritto: > Can you upload it or I should fix something else? > > 2011/5/9 Dmitry Shachnev : > > This will have no effect. > > I have already renamed that

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 04:07:42PM +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > I updated the package, fixing most of things you pointed. Check it out > (retext 1.0.1b-4). > Some notes: > * Lintian says I should put > "http://sourceforge.net/retext/ReText_(.+)\.tar\.gz" [0] to > debian/watch > * I didn't figure

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Can you upload it or I should fix something else? 2011/5/9 Dmitry Shachnev : > This will have no effect. > I have already renamed that file upstream (but maybe index is not updated > yet). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
I renamed those files upstream. 2011/5/9 Fabrizio Regalli : > Hi, > > Il giorno lun, 09/05/2011 alle 16.09 +0400, Dmitry Shachnev ha scritto: >> Fix: >> * Lintian says I should put >> "http://sourceforge.net/retext/ReText_(.+)\.tar\.gz" [0] to >> debian/watch, but I don't think it works >> > > > v

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Hi, Il giorno lun, 09/05/2011 alle 16.09 +0400, Dmitry Shachnev ha scritto: > Fix: > * Lintian says I should put > "http://sourceforge.net/retext/ReText_(.+)\.tar\.gz" [0] to > debian/watch, but I don't think it works > version=3 http://sf.net/retext/ReText_(.+)\.tar\.gz but it's not enough, b

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Fix: * Lintian says I should put "http://sourceforge.net/retext/ReText_(.+)\.tar\.gz" [0] to debian/watch, but I don't think it works 2011/5/9 Dmitry Shachnev : > I updated the package, fixing most of things you pointed. Check it out > (retext 1.0.1b-4). > Some notes: > * Lintian says I should put

Re: Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-09 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
I updated the package, fixing most of things you pointed. Check it out (retext 1.0.1b-4). Some notes: * Lintian says I should put "http://sourceforge.net/retext/ReText_(.+)\.tar\.gz" [0] to debian/watch * I didn't figure out how to rename files while dh_install'ing them, so I have put some "mv && d

Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-08 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Just a question: Should I create a new bug (to include its number) or it's not essential? 2011/5/8 Dmitry Shachnev : > Thanks for your advice! I will provide an updated package tomorrow. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-08 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 06:09:31PM +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Just a question: > Should I create a new bug (to include its number) or it's not essential? Sure, assuming another ITP/RFP bug does not exists for this software. You have to file a bug against the "wnpp" pseudo-package. You can d

Re: Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-08 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Thanks for your advice! I will provide an updated package tomorrow. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTimE9RyzZ==fkykyxlg3wa_enp5...@mail.gmail.c

Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-08 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 02:39:26PM +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 01:16:27PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: > > On '--pedantic' check: > > > > > > P: retext: no-upstream-changelog > > - it would be better to create it (if it's possibile) > > No, it's not. If an upstre

Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-08 Thread Alessandro Ghedini
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 01:16:27PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: > On '--pedantic' check: > > > P: retext: no-upstream-changelog > - it would be better to create it (if it's possibile) No, it's not. If an upstream changelog is not present, you can contact upstream and ask if she can provide one

Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-08 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Fixed (upstream tarball updated as well). Is it enough to provide /usr/share/doc/retext/changelog.gz, or we need one for retext-wpgen too? Dmitry Shachnev 2011/5/8 Fabrizio Regalli : > Hi Dmitry, > > two thing: > > W: retext source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.2) > - simpl

Re: RFS: retext

2011-05-08 Thread Fabrizio Regalli
Hi Dmitry, two thing: W: retext source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.2) - simply update your 'Standard-Version' field On '--pedantic' check: P: retext: no-upstream-changelog - it would be better to create it (if it's possibile) Cheers, Fabrizio. Il giorno dom, 08/05