> So which of these are used for creating the Myanmar.model
> file?
None of them, actually. Creating Myanmar.model takes a few steps:
1) Copy all Burmese words from Myanmar_List_v2.txt into Myanmar.model
2) For each word, create and store a reverse-look-up in Myanmar.model
(The next few steps are
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:26 PM, S'orlok Reaves wrote:
>
>> Quick question between talks; is any of this language model
>> software FOSS-licensed?
>
> There's
> From my understanding, these are both "free" and provide "source", but their
> licenses restrict them from being FOSS.
Correct, t
> Quick question between talks; is any of this language model
> software FOSS-licensed?
There's the CMU/Cambridge SLM kit:
http://svr-www.eng.cam.ac.uk/~prc14/toolkit.html
...which runs on Linux & Solaris. It is freely available, and comes with the
source, but the source's copyright boilerplate
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:12 AM, S'orlok Reaves wrote:
> If a third-party developer wants to create their own Myanmar.model, then they
> will need their own language model software. (For example, they might use
> weighted-difference pruning). Again, MyanmarList_v2.txt gives them everything
> t
Updated:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-waitzar/
> I guess so, no idea where the various jurisdictions stand
> on that. I'd
> err on the side of caution and say that they were/are
> derivative works
> of the fonts they are from. What role to they have in
Makes sense. I've remo
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:03 PM, S'orlok Reaves wrote:
>> Which fonts are these? I'm wary of adding fonts to source packages;
>> usually either the font is a copyright violation or should
>> be packaged separately.
>
> It was just the Myanmar 3 font, which (according to a page on
> fedoraproject
Ah, now we enter into the joyous legal details. I'll do my best to
be as helpful as possible in this regard; please let me know if you need
any clarifications. I only had to re-build one package this time:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-waitzar/
> Which fonts are these? I'm w
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:27 PM, S'orlok Reaves wrote:
>> Are you able to ship the spec in the source package and generate
>> Myanmar.model from the spec at build time? Or ship a myanmar-spec
>> source package that builds and installs the the Model file?
> Unfortunately, no. The model generator so
Thanks for the feedback. I'm going on a mini-vacation this weekend, so I worked
a bit extra
to implement your suggestions early --they were all pretty simple to nail down.
Re-uploaded:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libwaitzar/
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-wai
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:02 PM, S'orlok Reaves wrote:
> Packages uploaded to mentors:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libwaitzar/
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-waitzar/
Review, replies below.
>> It might be a good idea to produce a kanaung fork with a
>> new
Hope you all had a good holiday season. I've finally gotten some free time, so
I've addressed & implemented (most of) the changes you (Paul) suggested. Sorry
for such a long turnaround-time; I've had a lot of Debian policy reading to do.
;)
Packages uploaded to mentors:
http://mentors.debian.ne
Thanks for your review; I will address all of your points in turn later. At
present, though, there is one in particular I'd like to clarify:
> Personally I would expect /usr/include/waitzar-1.0/waitzar
> to be /usr/include/waitzar, since it is that way for most packages.
> Same for the pkgconfi
[ Please reply to -mentors at least ]
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:37 PM, S'orlok Reaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have split libwaitzar off from scim-waitzar and built a separate package:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-waitzar/
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/
Good evening,
I am re-submitting my packages scim-waitzar and libwaitzar for sponsorship,
after making the changes requested after my last submission. (One of these
changes involved splitting the package into two.)
Thanks again for your corrections; I learned a lot about packaging as I
imp
"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> debian/changelog is missing an ITP
Specifically, in case the maintainer isn't aware of what this means:
The initial release in the 'debian/changelog' should contain mention
that it "Closes: bug#NN", where NN is the bug number of the
ITP bug report
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> please read the best practicies for package descriptions
Here are the URLs for that:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-debian-control
http://web.archive.org/web/20070915131707/http
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:14 PM, S'orlok Reaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scim-waitzar/
Some comments:
debian/rules contains lots of commented out stuff and other unnessecary parts.
debian/docs shouldn't distribute the NEWS file until it contains
Good afternoon, everyone,
I've uploaded my package to mentors.debian.net; it
passes lintian and generates no additional warnings.
I've also refactored the package so that it is no
longer a Debian native package; the orig/diff/dsc can
now be found at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/mai
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:21 PM, S'orlok Reaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd suggest that you CC the Debian SCIM packaging
>> list for future RFS mails.
> Absolutely. I couldn't find any SCIM-related lists on
> lists.debian.org... could you point me to the Debian
> SCIM packaging list archive
> Please upload a source package to mentors.debian.net
> so that we can check it for issues and possibly
> upload it.
Sure thing. I'll upload it as soon as I can figure out
how to get GPG to output correctly. (Tonight,
hopefully.)
> I'd suggest that you CC the Debian SCIM packaging
> list for
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:49 PM, S'orlok Reaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good afternoon everyone,
> I am writing this email to request a sponsor for
> the brand new package, "scim-waitzar".
>
> The scim-waitzar project provides an IMEngine for
> SCIM that supports the Burmese language. In
Good afternoon everyone,
I am writing this email to request a sponsor for
the brand new package, "scim-waitzar".
The scim-waitzar project provides an IMEngine for
SCIM that supports the Burmese language. In
particular, it allows Burmese text to be typed through
the use of a romanisation, si
22 matches
Mail list logo
